• killingspark@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think the whole point was that a female gaze is just way less developed because they aren’t typically the ones observing but the ones being observed. At least that’s what I got from reading the article

      • killingspark@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s actually something the article talks about. According to the article, assuming women have that “gaze” because men do is the core of the misunderstanding.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yep, it’s pretty weird to go from “women generally want different things” to pretending women don’t find some people visually attractive. They were trying to frame the male gaze as a symptom of the patriarchy but not doing a great job of it.