• Mesophar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wouldn’t that also apply to calling them subs? Like, maybe it’s technically a community and not a sub-[item], but everyone knows what is meant by it.

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      We as a group stopped using ‘subs’ to distance ourselves from reddit. Had they not been as shitty as they were, we might still be using their terminology

      • frostysauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Speak for yourself, I’m not so obsessed with reddit that i need to make up new words just to price I’m not obsessed with reddit.

      • Mesophar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, but reclaiming “sub” would just be an example of language being dynamic. Unless someone is calling the communities “subreddits” I don’t think there should be this divisive issue about it.

        Use sub if you want, or not if you dislike the term.

        • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah I’m not telling anybody they can’t do it. I’m just positing my theory why we moved so quickly away from the old term.

          • Mesophar@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Sorry, my reply was more directed at the original commenter, but that would make sense.