• LesserAbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Listen, “comms” is a terrible name for this concept. I’m calling them subs until something better comes along.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      7 days ago

      Lol how so, Lemmy (the software) calls them “communities” and comms is a nice and shortened version of that

      • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m not saying subs is perfect. But comms has a much more predominant existing meaning: “communications.” It’s not clear what you’re referring to. While “sub” does have some existing meanings like “subscription” or “submissive,” those aren’t as pervasive meanings, and in my mental map it’s more associated with a subreddit or Lemmy community, so that’s what I’m going with.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Both of those words (community and comms) have common meanings that are adjacent but distinct in important ways from the Lemmy jargon meaning. That makes them confusing and awkward to use; what if you want to talk about the Lemmy community at large or some subset of it? You would have to go way out of your way to make sure all ambiguity is removed that you might be talking about a “community” as in the subreddit equivalent. Comms is not as bad in this way I guess.

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        That’s exactly why, actually. It’s too easy, like a kid naming their dog Mr. Woofs or naming a car Sally. I feel we can be far more creative.

        I can’t, but I’m sure someone can.

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Using “lemmings” is arguably more wrong - there are plenty of people on the fediverse who are not using lemmy.

  • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I just hate when anyone uses a name that signifies they use some site - lemmings, imgurians, redditors, whatever. I am no more a lemming than I am a reader for reading books or an eater for having dinner.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I know it’s a joke but there are probably users who get genuinely angry and unleash all kinds of undeserved abuse when they see this. Old habits are hard to break, so let’s be human.

    • Mr Poletski@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I like ‘subfeddit’, or we could go another way and call the something like ‘district’ or ‘constituency’, coz each one has a rep haha

    • Ziglin (it/they)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It sounds bad though and it makes me think of subscriptions which are what a subgroup of communities unique to each user.

      I have to remember that each time though it’s happening quite often now.

      I try to let people know gently that they are using the wrong term, which I think is reasonable though I suppose my tone might be misinterpreted.

    • D_C@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Say that to my FUCKING FACE…

      But this time use a growly menacing voice, and call me filthy names!! WAIT, I need to put on my gimp suit first.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    When someone refers to a community as a ‘comm’, they’re just trying to make ‘fetch’ happen.

    If you hit me up on ‘comms’, I’m gonna need a radio; that’s what the word means, if you’ve been alive any time in the last 100 years.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      that’s what the word means

      “You can’t use X word like that because [It’s made up|That’s not what it means|It means something else]” argument is always incredibly weak.

      At its very core, language is dynamic, words come, go and change all the time. It’s how it works. Languages that don’t change, die.

      On top of that, words can have multiple meanings that are dependent on context.

      • Mesophar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Wouldn’t that also apply to calling them subs? Like, maybe it’s technically a community and not a sub-[item], but everyone knows what is meant by it.

        • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          We as a group stopped using ‘subs’ to distance ourselves from reddit. Had they not been as shitty as they were, we might still be using their terminology

          • frostysauce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Speak for yourself, I’m not so obsessed with reddit that i need to make up new words just to price I’m not obsessed with reddit.

          • Mesophar@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yeah, but reclaiming “sub” would just be an example of language being dynamic. Unless someone is calling the communities “subreddits” I don’t think there should be this divisive issue about it.

            Use sub if you want, or not if you dislike the term.

            • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Yeah I’m not telling anybody they can’t do it. I’m just positing my theory why we moved so quickly away from the old term.

              • Mesophar@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Sorry, my reply was more directed at the original commenter, but that would make sense.