Blaze (he/him)@piefed.social to Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 11 days agoSurvey shows Gmail users would gladly sacrifice features for more privacywww.androidauthority.comexternal-linkmessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up1459arrow-down110file-text
arrow-up1449arrow-down1external-linkSurvey shows Gmail users would gladly sacrifice features for more privacywww.androidauthority.comBlaze (he/him)@piefed.social to Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square102fedilinkfile-text
Most of you said you’d switch to Proton Mail for the privacy, even if it meant giving up some of the convenience of Gmail.
minus-squarechunes@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·11 days agoEmail doesn’t need “features.” It’s been a solved problem for decades.
minus-squaremsage@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 days agoIt does need a PGP integration. I mean I know why it won’t, and never in Gmail, but we do need it.
minus-squareviking@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 days agoYou’d be surprised how seamlessly https://flowcrypt.com/ integrates with gmail. Been using it for years, zero complaints.
minus-squareA_norny_mousse@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 days agoI agree. I guess most of these people don’t understand the difference between the protocol/server and the client software, and most of those use the web ui anyhow.
Email doesn’t need “features.” It’s been a solved problem for decades.
It does need a PGP integration.
I mean I know why it won’t, and never in Gmail, but we do need it.
You’d be surprised how seamlessly https://flowcrypt.com/ integrates with gmail. Been using it for years, zero complaints.
I agree.
I guess most of these people don’t understand the difference between the protocol/server and the client software, and most of those use the web ui anyhow.