cross-posted from: https://crazypeople.online/post/2634649

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/65824884

Hey everyone

We’re really sorry to say this, but lemm.ee will be shutting down on June 30, 2025.

What you need to know

As of now:

  • New user registrations are disabled
  • Creating new communities is disabled

What you should do:

  • You can export your settings at https://lemm.ee/settings to take them with you to another instance.
  • If you’re moving to another instance, consider adding a note to your lemm.ee profile with your new username. Your old profile will still be visible from other instances even after we go offline.
  • Alternatively, if you want to delete your lemm.ee profile, now is the best time to do it, so the deletion can federate out before we go offline.
  • If you’re one of the folks supporting us with a recurring donation, please remember to cancel it (Ko-Fi donations should have been cancelled automatically already). Our leftover funds are already enough to cover our bills for next month, so we can keep things running without any more support.

Because of how Lemmy is built, everything posted on lemm.ee will still be accessible from other instances, even after we go offline.

Why this is happening

The key reason is that we just don’t have enough people on the admin team to keep the place running. Most of the admin team has stepped down, mostly due to burnout, and finding replacements hasn’t worked out.

The sad reality is that while there are a lot of great people on Lemmy, there are also some who use the platform to attack others, stir up conflict, or actively try to undermine the project. Admins are volunteers who deal with the latter group on a constant basis, this takes a mental toll. Please understand why our admins chose to step down, and be kind to the admins on whatever instance you decide to join.


We know this sucks. We’re genuinely sorry it’s ending like this. Thank you to everyone who spent time here and helped make it better.

lemm.ee team

  • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    I especially hope you don’t take this a sign that you should start promoting/directing people to create communities on piefed.

    Why not? What is the issue with Piefed?

    • rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The same issue of lemm.ee, lemmy.zip, or any other instance you’ve tried to push so far: they will all crumble under their own weight.

      • missingno@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        If the reason not to create a community on instance X is because instance X may someday disappear… isn’t that true of all instances? No one knows what the future may hold for any instance.

        Might as well pick somewhere that’s present today, and if the worst case scenario happens, we can always move. I would even argue one of the greatest strengths of Fedi is that no matter what happens to any one instance, the network is still standing.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          It is less likely for LW because they are (in Fediverse scale) “too big to fail” but still possible.

          • MrKaplan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 days ago

            I don’t think “too big to fail” is as much of a factor here as the fact that LW is not the only FHF platform. Fedihosting Foundation, the non-profit behind Lemmy.World and our other platforms, existed before Lemmy.World already. While the Lemmy moderation team is working mostly independently from the rest of FHF, if the LW admin team disappeared there would still be FHF in a position to search for new admins and probably also at least temporarily step in without requiring to shut down the instance.

              • MrKaplan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Ruud and Stux are not the only people involved.

                I’m personally only involved in Ruud’s side of things (mostly .world instances). Stux’ platforms are managed separately, I can’t say too much about those. Afaik finances between Ruud’s instances and Stux’ instances are also separate.

                On the .world side, we currently have 6 active members for infra. For moderation, LW currently has 4 active instance admins plus some community team members with elevated privileges. Other .world platforms have moderation separate from LW. We certainly don’t have resources to hire professional admins, but I’m sure that we would find a viable solution if Ruud ever wanted to leave things behind. Not all solutions require paying someone a salary for it, which seems to be your implication here.

                • rglullis@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I’m sure that we would find a viable solution if Ruud ever wanted to leave things behind. Not all solutions require paying someone a salary for it, which seems to be your implication here.

                  Beyond “raise enough resources to pay a professional”, can you think of any solution that is not a variation of “keep finding fresh volunteers to work until they burn out”?

                  • Ruud@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    I don’t see another option than volunteer-run instances or professionally run instances. And for professionally run instances you need funds (so paid subscriptions) and for volunteer-run instances you need volunteers…

                    In my experience, as long as there are enough active users, you’ll find enough volunteers.

                  • MrKaplan@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    can you think of any solution that is not a variation of “keep finding fresh volunteers to work until they burn out”?

                    how would paying admins prevent burnout? the only difference i see here is that it is probably easier to find people willing to do it as a paid job than volunteers, but they can both burn out. this would just change it from “keep finding fresh volunteers” to “keep finding fresh job applicants”.

          • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            A few people on the LW staff don’t seem as active as they were a year ago. Anyway, threads are going to be organized in all the communities, we’ll see what people prefer.

            • rglullis@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Anyway, threads are going to be organized in all the communities, we’ll see what people prefer.

              You really think you have no influence on that?

              Just as an example: you are still the most prolific poster on the football community at lemm.ee. If I told you that I could go right now and set up a new football instance for it (because you opposed the soccer.forum name, so I got jogabonito.news), would you even consider posting there or would you do what you’ve done before (created the community on lemm.ee and ignored what was already there?)

              • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                I just want to chime in and say that blaze isn’t the most prolific poster on [email protected], by a long shot, and I could a name a few people that have been more consistently posting.

                He also didn’t make the decision to migrate to lemm.ee. The decision to migrate was a community vote, and the instance chosen was decided by me.

                • rglullis@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  The first page now has 9 posts by him, 7 by Rose. Whenever I checked the page in the past, the distribution was similar.

                  As for “making decisions”: I am not saying he took any fiat action; I am saying that whenever he revealed his preference or had a chance to exercise any influence in the outcome, he clearly pointed (a) away from LW and (b) away from topic-instance that I was offering.

                  (Again, I am saying this not as believing I am entitled to anything, just as a matter of fact)

                  • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Here’s a post count. Rose, Sabre and Amsterdam have been more consistent throughout the year. 62 out of 83 posts from blaze have been in the last ~20 days, I’m actually surprised that he is consistently posting on [email protected] again.

                    I am saying that whenever he revealed his preference or had a chance to exercise any influence in the outcome, he clearly pointed (a) away from LW and (b) away from topic-instance that I was offering.

                    That’s accurate.

                    As an admin of a topic based instance, I do believe topic based instances are more sustainable for an admin team to handle. It seems to be the news/political communities that attracts the worst behaviour in people. Having instances that avoid those communities would lessen the moderation load put on a team.

              • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I think the fact that you think blaze is relevant in the football community only fuels apprehension towards trusting you to host the community. Please take a step back and be objective.

                • rglullis@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I am not judging “relevancy” and I am not even trying to convince him to participate. My “beef” with him is simple:

                  1. he keeps finding every possible reason to be biased against me (or Communick/the instances I am running) because I openly say that the “donation-based” Fediverse is not sustainable.
                  2. he gives the benefit of doubt to any other “free/open” instance which can seem like an underdog against LW
                  3. the instances he keeps promoting/defending are invariably failing, supporting my thesis that the “donation-based” Fediverse is not sustainable
                  4. When looking at the repeated cases of instances crumbling around, he doubles down on the idea of finding yet-another instance that is small and does not even contemplate the possibility that I might have a point.

                  Believe me when I say it: I am not interested in using the topic-based instances for personal gain. I want them to be a neutral ground and I wish they could be collectively owned. My “evil plan” is to have an easy way to onboard people coming from Reddit, and my bet is that if the ecosystem grows large enough then I would benefit by offering professional hosting services for the users.

                  • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    He feels that community lead instances have a better chance of sustainability. What’s wrong with that? You’re yet to convince him otherwise. You have a real chance of a proof of concept with soccer.forum and you’re too busy arguing rather than making a case as to why it’s a good destination to the community that matters. Make it make sense. 😮‍💨

                • rglullis@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Wouldn’t the first point imply the second, while you disapprove it?

                  I am not saying I disapprove it. I am saying your behavior is not dependent on “what other people think” and that you are (once again) hiding your real opinions and plans and using “others” as an excuse for your actions.

                  So, to put it more plainly: I am confident that you will look for any possible justification to move the lemm.ee communities to piefed or the other lemmy instances, despite this yet-another data point that shows that donation-based instances are not sustainable enough and reliable enough in the long term.

                  • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    another data point that shows that donation-based instances are not sustainable enough and reliable enough in the long term.

                    Then that includes LW, and we should just all leave this platform as it will inevitably die.