• Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Just because you don’t have an inner monologue doesn’t mean you are incapable of thought, or showerthoughts if we’re getting specific

    • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Correct, a lack of inner speech isn’t the same as an absence of thought

      It just seems like a true shower thought requires a narration to get so incredibly off tangent that it amounts to more than a simple epiphany

      Like Mitch Hedberg, he is a great example of someone who let their inner speech run free

      • Mothra@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        https://mander.xyz/post/20289088

        I’d still argue against that. I’ve had one true showerthought and it didn’t manifest as monologue, even though I do have an internal monologue. I had a concept and images for it. I spent some time trying to put it into words.

        I still don’t see how a showerthought (or any thought) has to have a verbal origin in the thinker’s mind; I would argue any internal monologue is but a secondary step after a thought has occurred. I’ve never heard of anyone being unable to predict what their own internal monologue is saying, and I’ve never heard of anyone being unable to make quick decisions because they had to first hear a command in their minds.