• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Attackers with physical access to a Linux system can access a debug shell simply by entering the wrong decryption password several times in a row.

    Yeah, no duh. This isn’t a critical security flaw unless you have the worst partition scheme on your encrypted volumes imaginable. It’s not even a process flaw at that point, just “possible”.

    This is essentially what the Israeli government did to Android a decade ago with Pegasus: if you can get in front of the bootloader, you can compromise disks once encrypted because everything is happening in an in-memory boot process.

    Same way you can hotwire cars. It’s not new.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m confused.

      Initramfs is unencrypted in /boot when using LUKS with RAID. It has to be, right?

      The attacker uses a debug shell to modify the unencrypted boot, so the next time you boot and type your LUKS password, they can gain access.

      This doesn’t line up with your comment?

        • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          You always “boot something that is unencrypted.” You then “mount” the encrypted volumes and load the OS.

          This is how people can put an SSH server (dropbear) in initramfs so they can unlock remotely.

          The attack is to initramfs, not the encrypted layer.

          The order’ish:

          • Boot
          • Initramfs loads, gives you the LUKS prompt
          • Initramfs decrypts/mounts OS
          • OS loads
            • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              But… your original comment is just… wrong?

              This isn’t a critical security flaw unless you have the worst partition scheme on your encrypted volumes imaginable.

              The default LUKS partition scheme is vulnerable.

              It’s not even a process flaw at that point, just “possible”.

              There is a successful POC, it is a flaw.

              you can compromise disks once encrypted because everything is happening in an in-memory boot process.

              This is not just in-memory. This is modifying the unencrypted part of initramfs on disk. Powering off the machine does not remove the exploit.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Physical access = electronic waste

      Thats how it has always been and always will be. If a threat actor had free access to your device for even just a couple seconds, its compromised rare earth trash.

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nope

          Exactly.
          Silicon is not a rare earth element.
          Neither is Aluminium nor plastic nor Lithium (it’s getting rarer alright, but doesn’t fall into the category).

          The amount of rare earth elements is really small in these devices.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Explain. The way i understand it, if somebody flashes malware into your firmware or bootloader then that device cant really be guaranteed to ever be safe again.

          • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            i know this is not for PCs but GrapheneOS uses the Google Titan chip and this app to solve that problem.

            might be a long time before we get similar hardware for PCs. the only thing that’s remotely similar is the Apple T2 for MacBooks but there’s no Linux distro with comparable security to GrapheneOS yet.

          • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Secure boot helps protect against evil maid attacks by checking hardware and OS signatures. If the boot process has been tampered with, the user can be alerted that the secure boot process can no longer properly verify signatures.

            While its probably true that you can no longer guarantee that system can be used safely ever again, at least you will be aware that it was tampered with and you can go ahead and send that system to e-waste and get you a new system.