baatliwala@lemmy.world to Android@lemdro.idEnglish · 19 天前The days of custom Android ROMs are numbered, and Google is to blamewww.androidauthority.comexternal-linkmessage-square181fedilinkarrow-up1521arrow-down114cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1507arrow-down1external-linkThe days of custom Android ROMs are numbered, and Google is to blamewww.androidauthority.combaatliwala@lemmy.world to Android@lemdro.idEnglish · 19 天前message-square181fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareGhoelian@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down4·19 天前Well yeah, because grapheneos is specifically made for security, not customiseability. Rooting your phone makes it a lot less secure, so it doesn’t seem strange to me that grapheneos doesn’t want you to.
minus-squareLimonene@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·19 天前Can you please explain how rooting adb only, not any apps, makes it less secure? Use concrete examples, not abstract.
minus-squareGenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·18 天前USB attacks with things like Celebrite are within scope of GrapheneOS’s security model.
minus-squareGhoelian@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down4·19 天前An exploited app can do more on a system that has more capabilities, simple as that.
Well yeah, because grapheneos is specifically made for security, not customiseability. Rooting your phone makes it a lot less secure, so it doesn’t seem strange to me that grapheneos doesn’t want you to.
Can you please explain how rooting adb only, not any apps, makes it less secure? Use concrete examples, not abstract.
USB attacks with things like Celebrite are within scope of GrapheneOS’s security model.
An exploited app can do more on a system that has more capabilities, simple as that.