moe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agoX expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square174fedilinkarrow-up1744arrow-down122
arrow-up1722arrow-down1external-linkX expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunchtechcrunch.commoe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square174fedilink
minus-squarenutsack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43·edit-25 days agoi don’t understand how it’s a boycott or how is illegal or unfair
minus-squareArchRecord@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·4 days agoIt’s not a boycott, neither is it illegal. He’s literally just being a crybaby and believes that anybody not pandering to his business model should be forced by the courts to give him money regardless.
minus-squareCileTheSane@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·4 days agoAnd he’s now President of the US so he gets to make the laws.
minus-squareCitizenKong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·4 days agoAnd he bought the position fair and square.
minus-squareWolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 days agoCriminal contempt of business model
i don’t understand how it’s a boycott or how is illegal or unfair
It’s not a boycott, neither is it illegal. He’s literally just being a crybaby and believes that anybody not pandering to his business model should be forced by the courts to give him money regardless.
And he’s now President of the US so he gets to make the laws.
And he bought the position fair and square.
Criminal contempt of business model