At the moment it would not be interoperable, but that is something we are planning to change once we can start testing it. Last time I checked, the lemmy test server wasn’t yet running a build that had post flair yet. As soon as it is, we would want to make sure that Activitypub messages we send have the same structure.
Piefed’s implementation is based off how Lemmy does it. Though, how Lemmy does it has changed.
Looking at the Lemmy implementation, I see it added a custom display_name field instead of the preferredUsername/name dynamic you’d normally use for Objects, ugh.
Is the flair implementation made in a way that Lemmy could add compatibility for it down the line?
At the moment it would not be interoperable, but that is something we are planning to change once we can start testing it. Last time I checked, the lemmy test server wasn’t yet running a build that had post flair yet. As soon as it is, we would want to make sure that Activitypub messages we send have the same structure.
Piefed’s implementation is based off how Lemmy does it. Though, how Lemmy does it has changed.
Looking at the Lemmy implementation, I see it added a custom
display_namefield instead of thepreferredUsername/namedynamic you’d normally use for Objects, ugh.