• DahGangalang@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Both being unsafe seems the most probably state of things.

    Still, something unsafe can still be safer than every other option ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • monogram@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Why choose if there are other solutions (like tuta) that use open standards

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Tuta also locks you down with their lack of IMAP support. You can only use their client. At least Proton has a bridge and allows you to use your own GPG key.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Proton does PGP for you. There are countless standards compliant mail services where you could use your own email client and do your own PGP -Thunderbird is probably the easiest but It’s a trade-off.

      • loudwhisper@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        What open standard (that are not used by proton too)? If anything proton uses GPG while tuta uses a custom system (which is why they also encrypt the subject).