• crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This guy/gal’s got the right idea. Turns out conservatives agree with a lot of leftist ideas when you don’t use their Boogeyman trigger words.

    • yucandu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’ve been saying that for decades but a lot of marxists are more into the aesthetics of marxism than the actual goals.

      • causepix@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They accuse you of their bogeyman trigger words whether or not you advertise it or are even actually doing the bogeyman thing in the first place. I fail to see how this would address that. The words need to be rehabilitated, not avoided, so they lose the knee jerk reaction that the right wing counts on.

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        More into Groucho than Karl?

        Then again, Groucho did say something like ‘I would never want to join a club that would admit me as a member.’, so perhaps not.

          • RmDebArc_5@feddit.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 hours ago

            After the programme was agreed, however, a clash arose between Marx and his French supporters arose over the purpose of the minimum section. Whereas Marx saw this as a practical means of agitation around demands that were achievable within the framework of capitalism, Guesde took a very different view: “Discounting the possibility of obtaining these reforms from the bourgeoisie, Guesde regarded them not as a practical programme of struggle, but simply … as bait with which to lure the workers from Radicalism.” The rejection of these reforms would, Guesde believed, “free the proletariat of its last reformist illusions and convince it of the impossibility of avoiding a workers ’89.” Accusing Guesde and Lafargue of “revolutionary phrase-mongering” and of denying the value of reformist struggles, Marx made his famous remark that, if their politics represented Marxism, “ce qu’il y a de certain c’est que moi, je ne suis pas Marxiste” (“what is certain is that I myself am not a Marxist”).

            Source

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        marxists are more into the aesthetics of marxism

        Sort of a selection bias.

        “The only Marxists I ever see are the ones advertising themselves” implies you might not be looking very hard

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’d be a Marxist if only I had the money they always seem to have laying around.