• trailee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This disturbs me in the best way. I love/hate it.

    I wonder how long they can run this before their backend database vendor cuts them off with some flimsy pretext because this kind of thing is bad for business.

    • lunarul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      No backend database needed for what they did. It was just highlighting where the faces are in a shot of the crowd, same as modern smartphone cameras do, but with a surveillance-type UI around it.

      • trailee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Thanks, I just watched the video linked by @[email protected] and I see that now. It’s actually a little disappointing and I’d love to see the same kind of public spectacle on hard mode with real-time doxxing from a commercial backend. That would be far more provocative.

        I think the article hugely understated that nuance.

        • lunarul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Most people don’t know the difference, as made clear by the reactions of the public, comments on other social platforms, and the wording of the articles. So it’s just as powerful as it was.

          • trailee@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            I will agree that it was still powerful. All of the phone videos would memorialize any real doxxing so it’s maybe just as well that they didn’t do it.

            I think it would be better with minor obfuscation like F***e L***e for Firstname Lastname. Something instantly recognizable to the victims/participants but not for the entire audience.