• WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because the owner class will undercut the cottage industry that people depend on to opt out of that system. See also Luddite protests and how that went down.

    And you can’t go to just live of the land because all land is owned by someone, so the violence inherent in the system will make you leave. Even if you own your land, there is usually tax to be paid on that land and that forced you to earn money, so that’s back to that cottage industry thing.

    There’s also no new system yet that can replace the current one where people can opt in and get a reasonably good standard off living.

      • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s a holdover from the middle ages. Kings owned the country and if someone disagreed you better have an army to make a good argument. Land was then doled out to lords and lesser tenants in exchange for services and goods. That got gradually turned into a state guaranteeing ownership by force and a market system. Overthrowing it ends up giving a temporary reprieve and just replacing the figure head.

        Other systems exist but they got crushed by the current system. Cryptocurrency and other ways of ownership seem to evolve to a digital lords owning the majority so long term not making a big difference.