In my relentless pursuit of trying to coax more performance out of my Lemmy instance I read that PostgreSQL heavily relies on the OSs disk cache for read performance. I’ve got 16 GB of RAM and two hdds in RAID 1. I’ve PostgreSQL configured to use 12 GB of RAM and I’ve zram swap set up with 8 GB.

But according to htop PostgreSQL is using only about 4 GB. My swap gets hardly touched. And read performance is awful. Opening my profile regularly times out. Only when it’s worked once does it load quickly until I don’t touch it again for half an hour or so.

Now, my theory is that the zram actually takes available RAM away from the disk cache, thus slowing the whole system down. My googling couldn’t bring me the answer because it only showed me how to set up zram in the first place.

Does anyone know if my theory is correct?

  • non_burglar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    zswap is specifically built to this end and far better suited to it.

    zram is great, but it is simply a ramdisk and inappropriate to ops task. It cannot dynamically grow/shrink or deal with hot/cold pages.

    • BB_C@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      zswap is not better than modern zram in any way. And you can set up the latter with writeback anyway.

      But that’s not OP’s problem since “swap gets hardly touched” in OP’s case.