• Google is putting together its framework for Android developer verification, connecting dev names to even sideloaded apps.
  • Recent additions to the Android SDK offer a little insight into how the system may ultimately operate.
  • One variable suggests that users may not be able to sideload even verified apps without an active network connection.
  • Galactose@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Has anyone here tried OpenHarmony ? An opensource implementation of Huawei’s HarmonyOS which is based on LiteOS ??

    We also need a unified effort to turn android devices into linux devices.

  • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    2 days ago

    They are modeling this after Apple’s technical response to being forced to allow other app stores.

    Would it shock you to learn that Apple revoked the certificates of developers who published apps they didn’t like on other app stores e.g. torrent client?

    Google will do the same exact thing with apps that impact the profitability of their native services e.g. Newpipe.

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      My next phone is very likely to be tbe most basic phone I can buy. If I can’t use my pc-priced, pc-spec device as the PC it is, I have no use for it.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    If i sideload apps, Play framework is frozen (since you can’t remove them without bootloop).

  • doleo@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This really could be a massive problem. Articles and posts suggesting that it will only ever affect a small number of users are short-sighted, at best.

    If google can refuse apps by unauthorised developers, and the criteria for authorisation shifts in the way that everything else seems to shift, that could mean a wide array of apps become effectively ‘blocked’.

    Right now, we’re all rightly worried about losing things like revanced. But what about when your local fascist government puts pressure on google to block the developer behind an app you like/love/need, because they made a joke about some gobshite getting shot?

    It’s bad enough that apple has always been this way, I’m saying that as a long term apple user. We desperately don’t need the only current mainstream alternative going that way, too.

  • a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m currently using an iPhone and I had planned to go back to Android the next time I upgraded because I missed F-Droid, Obtainium, and the choice of different browser engines more than I expected. This kind of throws a wrench into that plan. If my choice is between walled garden and walled garden, why switch?

    I’m currently looking into LineageOS to see if the cons of it are something I can tolerate. GrapheneOS seems cool but every pixel I’ve had has been unusable in the summer due to how it heats up and slows down to compensate. This sucks

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Any way around this? As much as I get that it will protect noobs from installing random stuff from the internet and getting scammed, I think having a setting hidden somewhere deep in settings would help not alienate power users.

    I guess the real reason is reVanced. Hopefully there will be a way to install it somehow. I would even pay for Premium, but the lack of swipe controls would really hurt my watching habits.

    • Kroko@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      You can install app from Android Debug Bridge (adb). It will bypass all new restriction.

      • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        How arduous is that for non developers? Is this something a regular non-technical person can do?

        Glad there is a workaround, I’m mostly curious how likely it is to be used.