• over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    25 days ago

    Fun fact: That CPU can’t even run Windows 10. Even though it’s 64 bit and dual core, it’s missing a required instruction or two for Windows 10.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      I would be surprised if it could run Windows 10.

      I am assuming Windows 7 plus unofficial patches would work relatively well.

          • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            25 days ago

            I’ve been able to run AntiX on my Pentium 3 rig, and it was significantly faster than Windows XP. AntiX is just Debian meant to run on very low end systems. I’m sure an Athlon 64 X2 could easilly handle something like Xfce or LXQT. The main limiting factor is going to be the system RAM.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        25 days ago

        Oh, my Athlon 64 X2 with nForce 4 chipset absolutely loved Windows 7, no unofficial patches even necessary.

        When Microsoft released Windows 10, it gave me the notification that I could upgrade for free, so I figured I’d try it. The stupid update just wasted my time downloading the whole thing before it bothered checking the system requirements, just to tell me my system wasn’t compatible and not supported.

        I had already been using Linux occasionally ever since 2011, but it wasn’t long after Windows telling me my system wasn’t Windows 10 compatible that I made the permanent switch to Linux.

        The only time I run Windows anymore is XP in a virtual machine, mainly for older games and legacy software.