• ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    16 days ago

    I thought I knew which study this was talking about, and I was going to say “Yes, it’s to help with situations where surgical intervention is needed to put the bone back together” but I went and found the article I read and that one was a team of American and Korean scientists, so I actually don’t know about the Chinese one. I assume it’s the same idea, that it’s for use in surgical situations.

    The one I thought it was talking about was this one, which is a cool idea but still has some kinks to work out.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202509/1343380.shtml

      I can’t read the specific study they’re citing here, but from reporting on it this sounds like it’s being just a little bit overhyped - a quick setting glue is critically important, but the situations in which you’d use a metal plate for osteoimmobilization are with extreme displaced fractures and something that could even be accessed with a 3 minute surgery (and evidently yes, this glue does require surgery) would not merit a metal plate in any case.

      The actual development sounds like it’s a very fast setting bone-bonding bio-absorbing surgical glue that doesn’t require extensive cleaning of the bonding site. That does sound like an extremely useful development, but it’s also not a novel product by any means. This seems like another entry in the trend of pro-china hyped science reporting that absolutely removes all the interesting details in their quest to push a narrative (which uh… no hang on, that’s all modern science reporting)