• dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    This is why the web is way better than any app store, yes even with the problems of DNS (DIDs becoming more prevalent cant come fast enough though). Any future phones should have a first class web experience imo.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      It’s how I browse Lemmy - I sometimes forget that my home-pinned app, Voyager, isn’t actually from the app store.

      • maximumbird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I had to look it up too

        Apparently it stands for “decentralized identifiers”

        From what I’m gathering it’s a client based web protocol That works in conjunction with DNS

        • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Thanks. I’d already be happy with updating/mutable v2 torrents for browsing static websites via hashkey.

    • wabasso@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m only just learning about this, but don’t the encrypted DNS protocols solve the privacy problem?

      Or do you mean more like not being able to trust a registrar or public DNS server?

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        Usually when people complain about DNS, they’re talking about stability issues. In this case I think he’s pointing out how centralized it is, and how a bad actor could cause significant issues

        At a local level, the most common issue I know of is ISPs blocking sites at the DNS level by feeding in fake information that redirects you to one of the ISP’s blocked/parked domains. Usually implemented to prevent customers going to piracy sites. It’s not much of an issue to subvert currently, as you can simply use any public DNS provider

        That being said, much of that has been consolidated into a dozen or so tech companies. In the current political climate, I could see a coordinated effort happening between those tech companies to block sites deemed non gratis. Obviously there’s still ways to subvert it, but the vast majority of user’s won’t be able to