• Prathas@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          No, ADB will still allow installation of anonymous apps. All this hullabaloo is talking about non-ADB installation.

          • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            He’s not wrong in a way. If ADB is overwhelmingly used and “undesirable” apps (vanced and “streaming apps”) don’t see any drop in support or usage, or if governments see a massive number using this to fly under the surveillance radar, they’ll restrict ADB too…

            Likely they’ll pull what Meta did and make everyone who wants to enable “developer mode” will actually need to prove they are indeed, a developer.

            • Prathas@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 days ago

              Well, I’m not a dev and did that just for SideQuest access, so it’s easy enough… but yeah, for those wishing (near-)total anonymity, I see what you mean…

          • DanVctr@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Oh word? I feel slightly better then. Still going to make it more of a pain to install ad block on my parents new devices

            • Prathas@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 days ago

              Right, so the issue is how many devs will stay motivated to keep developing knowing that staying unregistered may significantly reduce users’ draw…