• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Here (Denmark) we can’t even have them if they show just a bit of pavement or road or anything outside the grounds for the house.

    I guess we are the 2 extremes in that regard. 😜

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I can absolutely understand if Americans want to move here. Compared to the rest of the world, it sometimes seems like we are living in some fairy tale bubble, where our problems are manageable, or the rest of the world is some parallel universe where some things simply went wrong.

        With the only known Exceptions to me being Norway and Switzerland.

    • LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same in Germany. The same applies to nonfunctional camera dummy bodies because you can swap them to be an actual camera without anyone noticing anytime. And I am really glad that it is regulated like this.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The same applies to nonfunctional camera dummy bodies

        Interesting, I know we had a case a couple of years back, where a non functional camera was deemed illegal, because as you say people can’t tell the difference.
        This camera was set up however for the specific purpose of making it look like a public space was surveilled, but I guess it would work as precedence for the same as you describe.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Considering the immense corruption inherent to modern commercial institutions, it’s probably for the best.