• ihexx [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    could shave

    hahahahahahahaa come on now, we all know those savings are passing to shareholders not consumers

  • Dubiousx99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    It also shows that if labor cost being eliminated is only a 30 cent saving per product, then a higher salary can’t result in that much of an increase in

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They probably mean it’s predicted to make them 20ct more profit per item, not shave off cost for us, right? Most I ever see is increased prices and then the minimum order to qualify for free shipping increase by 10€ last year, and by another 10€ this year…?!

  • timetraveller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    About time. Who wants to do the robots job now days. Who desires to stock and fulfill orders in a warehouse if a robot can do it.

    Do we regret vending machine?

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Automation is never the problem, nor is a shift to different industries. It’s what happens to the worker. There are reasons why there is competition between robots and people in these low skill areas, but it’s assumed they’ll just move to another low skill work, rather than try and help them move upwards, or just not need the job - not everyone in the workplace should be there by income necessity, but many are because retirement income isn’t enough or it’s a second or third job to get by, or for insurance purposes (which being tied to a job is its own racket).

      But as more automation potentials start to creep into other areas than just the simple manual labor the question becomes, where are these people going to go? Not only the tedious mental jobs but also the “extra” filler jobs that automation takes over or eliminates completely. It feels like a job version of “First They Came”, where as long as MY job is safe for now, the lower workers just have to figure it out. In theory, any job eventually won’t be safe, and when are we going to plan for that path?

      But all the best answers are put in a socialist basket and are politically dangerous, even though it would help everyone. Even the CEOs and shareholders, but they can’t seem to see that.

    • king_link1@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Agree, these jobs are legit the worst, there is a reason there is so high turnover rate for these jobs