• m532@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    I have evidence that they do use the same dataset. When asked in german, my llm answers in broken german that suspiciously looks like it was translated from another language. If it only used german training data for this, it would have proper grammar.

    Humans aren’t special, never have been. Thinking is just another natural process that machines can also be made to do.

    • Ilixtze@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Pfft! typical antihuman thinking! I’ve heard enough of this human’s aren’t special propaganda. I’ve tried the hyped Markov chain and usually it has a strong bias towards European languages and a much lower effectivity when asked in languages of the global south, which checks out with the availability of the training data and the biases of the people training these black boxes.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      I believe actual thinking is non-computational but also that artificial neural nets can be made to emulate it at a lossless quality and that text based GPT models are basically year 1 Mp3 quality.

      • whoever loves Digit@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        But lossless isn’t lossless. It’s just digitally lossless. The metaphor here would be more like analog conversion, where a FLAC copy of a vinyl isn’t exactly the same as the vinyl.

        I think. Idk. I’m overthinking the metaphor without really knowing what a soul is or anything.