• Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    The price is also reported to have climbed from an early projection of $3,000 to around $3,900, placing it well above Huawei’s MateBook Fold, a similar 18-inch model that sells for about $3,400 in China. Huawei’s machine, however, features a Kirin X90 chip built on China’s two-year-old 7nm process – a reminder that China remains several generations behind Western fabs. By contrast, Apple’s collaboration with Samsung keeps it tied to the cutting edge but at a much higher cost in both engineering and price.

    $3,900 for a tablet (even a foldable one) does not sound like a viable proposition.

    • onlinepersona@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s about prestige. Once it catches on and rich people are seen with it, normal people will start buying them too to look prestigious too.

        • ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You couldn’t really take them to a Starbucks though. This feels more portable for what many people use computers for on casual setups (shop, music and videos).

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Good, nobody wants a paper thin phone. You have to put an extra thick case on it just to make in comfortable to hold.

    • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, people might want it…if it were a decent product. But, good in terms of engineering though it may be, both the base model ($200) cheaper snd the pro model ($100) more expensive have much better specs.

      Sk you have to make a trade-off in terms of specs just for the thinness. And I’d have thought that even most people who’d want a thin phone would prefer better value for money in terms of features.

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Maybe people would want an ultra thin phone, but not when it has a giant tumour that makes it actually almost twice as thick as an iPhone 6.

      Someone should manufacture a 1mm thin phone by disassembling one and mounting the screen at a 90 degree angle to the rest of the components, as that’s apparently how we measure “thickness” these days.

      • Rooster326@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        If being thin was the penultimate then we’d all use pens/pencils thinner than toothpicks. At a certain point you’re no longer ergonomic for human hands.