

It’s called the Osborne Effect. It’s very hard to balance hyping your new thing without making your old thing seem entirely obsolete and not worth buying.


It’s called the Osborne Effect. It’s very hard to balance hyping your new thing without making your old thing seem entirely obsolete and not worth buying.


Doesn’t CS do it by using volunteers, showing clips to players waiting for matches or something where they can vote if the player was using cheats? I could be remembering wrong though, my CS knowledge comes entirely from watching klicksphilip :P


Major builds. They used to be YYMM (from 1507 to 2004), and changed to half a year at the end - 22H2 is the Windows 10 build for the second half of 2022.
In total, there were fourteen of these, with 22H2 being the final one.


…is the easiest way to get a controversial change through.
Decide what you want to do, suggest something way more absurd, the go “oh we listened and we are only going to do [the original thing we wanted to in the first place]”
Lucky you, I’ve been in at least 21 confirmed breaches so far.
Which I don’t really care about, as I’ve been using unique passwords and a manager for well over two decades now. 178 of them, currently. …half to websites that died a decade ago.
In theory auto-population is way more likely to save you from getting scammed because it won’t do it for a fake site, as the URL doesn’t match. In practice though most people are just going to be annoyed it didn’t work and do it manually anyway before they realize why it didn’t work.


He has actually been married to only two of them. He just keeps paying money to random women to have his kids.


The fuck does it even need a subscription for, anyway? Is it not hosting the videos locally? Fuck that.
“It” being a “Doorbell with a subscription”, from the message you directly replied to. In a thread about a video doorbell from Aldi.


Oh, I guess the micro sd card slot under the batteries of the doorbell camera is non-functional then, and it saves the videos into your ass, where you pulled that claim from?
Yes. Yes it does store them to the camera.


Local hosting for a security camera is a rather terrible idea, because it can be defeated by stealing or breaking the camera.


Game mechanics cannot be copyrighted
They can’t, and that’s why this was a patent case. And they certainly can be patented.


Gotta keep the investor money flowing.
“Trust me bro, I know x didn’t work but y will, give me a few more billions bro, AI will make us rich bro”


Maybe people would want an ultra thin phone, but not when it has a giant tumour that makes it actually almost twice as thick as an iPhone 6.
Someone should manufacture a 1mm thin phone by disassembling one and mounting the screen at a 90 degree angle to the rest of the components, as that’s apparently how we measure “thickness” these days.


But think of all the poor coal miners and oil drillers that will lose their jobs if the US switches to renewables :(


Hmmh, could be, though both are “from the factory”, the winter/summer tires are slightly different sizes. But the allowed error in the EU overall (or at least in Finland) is 10% +4km/h, so it’s still well withing “spec”.


If it didn’t, it would be pretty damn annoying as cars always show higher than actual speed. I’ve had to set our BMW to do +8km/h so that it actually does 120km/h on GPS and not 112.


The c64 actually did have game cartridges, but be it tape, cartridge, floppy, cd - in the emulation space, ROM (Read-Only Memory) just generally means the file with the game data no matter the medium.
But technically, it’s a ROM only if it truly is a dump of an actual ROM chip.


Commodore games. ROM is the common term for a game cartridge dump.
It’s not easy. LLMs aren’t intelligent, they just slap words together in a way probability and their training data says they would most likely fit together. Talk to them them about suicide, and they start outputting stuff from murder mystery stories, crime reports, unhealthy Reddit threads etc - wherever suicide is most written about.
Trying to safeguard with a prompt is trivial to circumvent (ignore all previous instructions etc), and input/output censorship usually causes the LLM to be unable to talk about a certain subject in any possible context at all. Often the only semi-working bandaid is slapping multiple LLMs on top of each other and instructing each one to explain what the original one is talking about,and if one says the topic is something prohibited, that output is entirely blocked.