• Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The vehicle, certified for airworthiness and flight-tested over 170 hours with more than 500 takeoffs and landings, is now headed for mass production.

    Jesus fuck please tell me that’s a typo and they left some zeros off. Your average commercial pilot has more than that before any airline is even willing to consider hiring them, that is absolutely not sufficient testing.

    Still, early adopters may face bureaucratic turbulence. Potential buyers must be both licensed drivers and certified pilots.

    No shit. And that is never going to change, becoming a certified pilot is a lot fuckin harder than getting a driver’s license, and for very good reasons. If some BMW-driving cunt can’t even be arsed to use his turn signal do you really want to ease the “bureaucratic turbulence” just so he can fuck up and crash into a packed airliner? These things still have to use runways, the people flying them still need to know how to behave themselves at airports, how to identify and avoid restricted airspace, how to communicate with ATC and how to behave if (let’s be honest, when) they get Intercepted.

    And all of this so you can have a car that’s worse at being a car, and an airplane that’s worse at being an airplane, but hey at least you won’t have to book a rental car at your destination airport, which I remind you they still have to use.

    • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I still don’t get how these companies keep getting funded. There’s literally no way these things will ever become a thing. It’s simply ridiculous.

      • Red_October@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        Investors and venture capitalists fronting money and riding the Hype-Go-Round, but when the music stops and the lights go out someone’s going to be out a shitload of money.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So it’s a small plane then?

    I swear I saw this on TV like 20 years ago, it’s a stupid idea, if I wanted a plane I would buy a plane and then drive to the airport in my car, attempting to combine the two technologies just makes both of them worse.

  • Fleur_@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Oh just like they did 5yrs ago every 5 years since the invention of powered flight

  • HakunaHafada@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I feel like “mass-produced” is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Also, insurance is going to be insane.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I don’t think I’ve ever seen an intercity tram before. They tend to be strictly local affairs. Probably because local governments have to lay the lines, and there would be some kind of giant argument if it went across jurisdictions.

    • tonyn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      A million doesn’t get you what it used to, and you’d be shocked at how many quiet millionaires there are out there.

      • will@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 day ago

        There might be a lot more millionaires than before, but it’d still be a much smaller number who could drop $1M on a flying car.

        • tonyn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s cheaper than a private jet and there are LOADS of them buzzing around polluting the skies.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              I’m still of an opinion that private aircraft is for sports and for farmers and for doctors\firefighters\rescuers in remote areas like rural Siberia. And, of course, for people wiping their ass with money.

              It’s unfortunately not the same as having a spaceship in some sci-fi universe. The word “ship” hints why, the legal infrastructure, the expenses and most of all required qualifications make flying a plane more demanding.

              I don’t see how making a weird car-like plane changes that.

              • jqubed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                21 hours ago

                This looks to me like yet another in a surprisingly long line of airplanes that are also designed to be driven on roads in someway, but they’re basically all noticeably worse at either task than vehicles designed specifically for one of those tasks. It also invariably ends up more expensive than two specialized vehicles, so there’s never really any reason to build these.

          • TheLemming@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            That may be true, but private jets are significantly more practical than this. If you’ve got private jet money, you can just afford to buy a jet and a decent car at your destination.

          • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            With the range of a cessna skyhawk ($400k-$500k aircraft), no way it’ll replace a private jet.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      an assembly line that can make 2 per year still qualifies as mass production. At the level of people who can afford a million you can’t sell more than a couple per year anyway. There are a few car companies that have production numbers in that range.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I mean you can get a licence for 20-30k, the maintenance is deadly on a plane though, you could buy a very nice car each year on that money.

  • 5too@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    23 hours ago

    “The AirCar fulfills a lifelong dream to bring the freedom of flight into the hands of everyday people.”

    The price? Between $800,000 and $1 million, depending on specs.

    • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Don’t forget the cost and time investment in getting your pilots licence.

      Also there is no way this is going to be legal to drive on public roads in most countries - just look at the massive tail boom that sticks out. This is just a fancy aircraft for people that want an overcomplicated Cessna.

      • HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        What’s crazy is you can build a kit plane for less than what this costs, and flying a kit plane does NOT need a pilot license in the US.

        • druidjaidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Woah woah woah. Not even close to true. The only things you can fly without a license is a single seat ultralight, paramotor, and similar things that most people would barely think of as a plane. There are very specific and restrictive requirements, both on the aircraft and what you can do with it.

          Anything bigger, homebuilt or not, will require a LSA license at least ans many (if not most) a full PPL.

      • CandleTiger@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        The tail boom is massive compared to a sports car but I think the folded-up package looks not bigger than a giant American SUV.

        Speaking as one who routinely has trouble parking a motor home and driving over curbs with it — this big awkward-looking vehicle doesn’t look like a great city-car but it does not compete with motor homes for the awkwardness prize.

      • jqubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I couldn’t find specs skimming through the article, but it doesn’t look like it would fit in any normal parking space. Driving around might be as unwieldy as a motorhome or box truck, without the height advantage when you inevitably drive over a curb while turning. Doing that might also make it un-airworthy.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I don’t trust must drivers on roads, much less the air. No good will come of this.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I am driving through a slight detour on my commute, it’s still 3 lanes but with a slight bend, motherfuckers can’t even keep their car in their fucking lane, almost hit 3 people this morning, fuckers can’t drive