I am an anarchist, anarchists are against hierarchy, that’s what the word means.
He had the power to dismantle hierarchy, he should have used it.
Edit: Good to know he did fight those folks though, but if you’re not at least trying to dismantle the systems that created them, then you’re not actually an anarchist.
Anarchists want to get rid of the systems of control, power and hierarchy which cause the problems in the first place, not merely to continously fight the ‘bad guys’ but do nothing about them being created.
I am an anarchist too😁, and Son Goku was against many injustices by various hierarchies in his adventures. The fascists died, the dictators either reformed or died. The imperialists died, and got resurrected later. Zamasu is stuck on his universe. Without fighting Masters, Goku would have never met Gohan, and found a grandfather to call his own.
It’s that not everything he does is anarchic, but he is not the focus of the satire. He is merely a vehicle to process an ethic. A Buddhist ethic if you will.
I am an anarchist, anarchists are against hierarchy, that’s what the word means.
He had the power to dismantle hierarchy, he should have used it.
Edit: Good to know he did fight those folks though, but if you’re not at least trying to dismantle the systems that created them, then you’re not actually an anarchist.
Anarchists want to get rid of the systems of control, power and hierarchy which cause the problems in the first place, not merely to continously fight the ‘bad guys’ but do nothing about them being created.
I am an anarchist too😁, and Son Goku was against many injustices by various hierarchies in his adventures. The fascists died, the dictators either reformed or died. The imperialists died, and got resurrected later. Zamasu is stuck on his universe. Without fighting Masters, Goku would have never met Gohan, and found a grandfather to call his own.
Thank you.
Not sure I necessarily agree everything about him is anarchist, but I admit that’s some compelling evidence.
It’s that not everything he does is anarchic, but he is not the focus of the satire. He is merely a vehicle to process an ethic. A Buddhist ethic if you will.