[green talks in a mic while orange sits at the other end of the table, cross armed, angry] On today’s podcast episode, I’d like to better understand the far right so I invited a literal nazi, maybe they’ll make some good points

[blue, satisfied] Freedom of speech

[green talks in a mic while yellow sits at the other end of the table, happy to be there] On today’s podcast episode, I invited an artist who also happens to be a pro-palestine activist, let’s listen to what they have to say

[blue, pissed] TOO FAR! We are pulling our sponsorship

https://thebad.website/comic/least_fragile_sponsor

  • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Death to Nazis, death to the IDF. Death to any people who would impede upon another person’s inalienable human rights to freedom to live their lives.

    • Renat@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Calling Israel and IDF nazi is a dog whistle to dehumanize them. They are not support Hitler’s ideology.

      • Bad@jlai.luOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Cmon these comparisons are almost as old as Israel itself.

        Back in 1948 you already had prominent jewish people comparing zionists to nazis (Einstein was one of them).

        My family of holocaust survivors never had kind words for Israel, and were always pissed that they were pretending to be the country legacy of holocaust survivors while building up an ethnostate of their own on stolen land, complete with camps and all.

        You can’t dehumanize people who have already done the work of dehumanizing themselves, unless you think I’m dehumanizing MAGA too when I compare them to 1930s fascists.

        It’s only a dogwhistle when it comes from problematic people.

        • Renat@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          An ethnocracy(etnostate) is a type of political structure featuring “rule by a particular ethnos in a multi-ethnic situation”. Israel is not ruled by single ethnos. Itamar Ben-Gvir -leader of party Otzma Yehudit with 6/120 Knesset members is Mizrahi Jews(arab jew). United Arab List have 5/120 Knesset members.

          I once saw someone got accused for using dog whistle when they used the same comparison, but to Islamists and description of Amin al-Husseini relationship with Hittler.

          • Bad@jlai.luOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Are you daft or what.

            An ethnostate doesn’t mean 100% of its inhabitants or ruling class are of the same ethnicity, it’s a state where some people have privileges over the others purely based on their ethnicity. Sure the arab list is allowed to exist as long as they’re not a threat, South Africa had black politicians during the apartheid too.

            “But Ben Gvir is mizrahi” is one of the dumbest zionist arguments I’ve ever read. There were dutch, british, afrikaaner, and other types of whites in South Africa, I don’t see how this disproves the existence of a South African white ethnostate during the apartheid.

            Israel constitutionally defines itself as the nation-state of the jewish people, gives automatic citizenship to jews exclusively via the law of return, and enforces different legal systems in occupied territories depending on ethnicity. That’s the textbook definition of an ethnostate.

            Can you piss off from my replies and go be a lapdog to the genocide gang somewhere else. I’m really not interested in the void that populates your brain, you’re not worth a single extra second of my time.