justdaveisfine@piefed.social to Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agoA cold take on balancingmedia.piefed.socialimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up186arrow-down15
arrow-up181arrow-down1imageA cold take on balancingmedia.piefed.socialjustdaveisfine@piefed.social to Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squarePeruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·15 hours agoIn the first panel, each class is considered in its interactions with each other class. In the second, each class is strong against one, weak against one and their relationship with the others isn’t considered.
minus-squareDreamButt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 hours agoI read it as the adjacent ones being neutral or a 50:50 odds. But it sounds like ur interpretation might be the intention
In the first panel, each class is considered in its interactions with each other class. In the second, each class is strong against one, weak against one and their relationship with the others isn’t considered.
I read it as the adjacent ones being neutral or a 50:50 odds. But it sounds like ur interpretation might be the intention