Thank you for your insightful reply.

I also found this: https://www.citizensforethics.org/news/analysis/trumps-politicization-of-the-u-s-marshals-service-is-a-threat-to-our-democracy/

It says that one of the primary functions of the US Marshals Service is to carry out judicial orders, but it reports to the president. This looks like a flaw to me.

Sorry, I’m a foreigner and I don’t understand much. Someone cares to explain? Should the police normally enforce judicial orders and sentences? Why do they not? Is the police personally loyal to Trump?

It’s a gnome foot though.

Nice. In what year(s) did you have your first computer?

I don’t think the right would care.

Yea. Punishment only make sense in influencing future behavior. Once the AI exist… it already exists…

deleted by creator

I hope they are ready for the influx.

XMPP then

It’s possible she intended to use it for something else, such as scrapping food from dishes (sounds like a bad idea, but at least it’s safe hygiene-wise)

I’ve read that she was personally involved in the brutality. Wikipedia gives some details and sources.

Why not accept her, treat her, and try her for her crimes?

It took me a while to notice.

For those still unaware: there are barely hidden salutes.