

OpenSUSE is fantastic.
I gave Tumbleweed a few days, concluded it’s possible to do anything I might want to do on it, and then promptly went back to my Endeavour install :D.
Eskating cyclist, gamer and enjoyer of anime. Probably an artist. Also I code sometimes, pretty much just to mod titanfall 2 tho.
Introverted, yet I enjoy discussion to a fault.


OpenSUSE is fantastic.
I gave Tumbleweed a few days, concluded it’s possible to do anything I might want to do on it, and then promptly went back to my Endeavour install :D.


A part of it is concern.
System administration on a system you’re planning to use remotely over the internet must be done right. Not being sure what you’re doing is how we all learn, but you really should be sure before exposing yourself to the internet.
It’s not like experimenting with linux on a laptop. Self-hosting is usually about providing some sort of service for yourself, which if accessed by someone malicious, can be used to really hurt you.


The lemmy user to linux user pipeline is real.


In a nutshell:
Google is spending a shitload of money to find bugs in FOSS projects, but then refuses to spend the fraction more it would cost to contribute an actual fix, rather than just a bug report.
Basically, they are willing a spend a ton on finding a bunch of work for FOSS developers to do, but not on actually getting any of it done.


I didn’t tho.
You’re confusing my homelab with my dads OMV NAS that is running kopia as its only non-standard service because I wanted to use it as my off-site target.
I wasn’t presenting OMV as the solution to all of OPs examples, I literally just commented to point out “hey this is kinda like hexos but foss”.
To which you responded “lol no, there is no comparison”. Which is both untrue, and a rude way to go about saying anything.
I don’t use docker via a GUI. And I don’t run docker at all on the NAS running OMV.
My backup solution is Kopia. Two servers, each running an instance that backs up local storage to the other.
OP isn’t talking about a full homelab. If all you need is a home VPN and some network storage via SMB, OMV is fine.
For my homelab, OMV would be clunky af. For the NAS at my dad’s end, it’s ideal.
For a free foss alternative, look at OMV (OpenMediaVault).
Most of what a user might need is fairly simple to set up in the webUI, and if you know what you are doing, you can still go into the underlying debian system and do whatever you like.


Looks like in plasma 5 you need to mess with .desktop files placed in ~/.local/share/templates/


It’s not a dotfolder. It has to be “Templates” not “.Templates”.
Hence my follow-up on how to hide it.


Multiple games have done it, but something along the lines “try not dying” as the loading screen tip after dying about a dozen times is always funny to me.


If you’d like to hide the Templates folder, you can create a file called “.hidden” in your home directory.
In it, simply write “Templates”.
This way the folder becomes hidden, without changing its name to add a period.
You can add additional lines with more file and foldernames, so you can keep your home directory tidy for normal use, even if stuff relies on a file or folder there not having a period in the name.


To add more file creation options, you use a Templates folder.
Just create a folder named “Templates” in your home directory. Then use rnote to save an empty rnote file in that directory.
Your right click menu to create new files should now get an option to “create” rnote files (which are really just copies of the file in the Templates folder).
You can add whatever types of files you want in Templates, and they don’t have to be empty.


You’re confusing my use of the word community in its literal meaning, with its meaning as a term in the context of lemmy as a piece of software.
I do not think that sorting people online by where they are from would help.
In fact I think sorting people online by where they are from could even be harmful, and potentially dangerous.
That the change you would make is small, does not change my opinion that it would be for the worse, nor that your reasoning for wanting to make it, as I understand it, seems faulty.


My proposal concerns servers, not communities.
What’s the difference? Servers are communities.
encourage them to join local communities where they might discuss local issues
There’s that false dichotomy again. I think what instance someone is on has very little effect on what content they engage with. And if it does, this change would be detrimental rather than beneficial.
Corporate social media is only biased towards local if you count the whole USA as “local”. Again, seems to be a misunderstanding. In the US case “local” would mean state or town.
We must be using different corporate social media. Of course facebook, twitter and tiktok show different content depending on every factor there is. The thing is, they wont confront you with people from your town that have a different opinion. They are tuned towards NOT changing whatever opinion you already have, unless you’re pre-disposed to going down dopamine-laced rabbit holes.
Meanwhile, the fediverse does confront people with differing opinions. That it doesn’t necessarily do so locally, is a feature, not a bug.


I don’t agree.
You present two things as if they are mutually exclusive, when they are not.
The very starting point of your argument seems to be that current niche communities can only exist at the expense of local geographic communities.
As such, you seem to suggest sacrificing existing communities in favor of hypothetical “better” communities based on physical proximity.
Such communities are useful in terms of political mobilization, but they aren’t very fun. People don’t bond over tax rates, they bond over tabletop rpgs, cats, music, movies, etc. And you can’t engage in those bonding activities in local communities until they themselves are big enough to contain such niches within them.
And all of these things can exist simultaneously. In fact I completely reject your view that niche online communities do more harm than good.
Boiled down, your view seems to equate to seeing a bunch of people having fun, and telling them to go do something useful, while completely dismissing that it doesn’t matter whether I learn empathy from my neighbor, or someone on the other side of the world.
What you’re asking for, IMO, is for the fediverse to work more like facebook and twitter, which HEAVILY bias their feeds towards local matters. The US would not have been so easy to turn into a xenophobic ball of angry people if their social media were MORE international.
TikTok is even worse about it. The one time I gave it a chance, it was 90% content local to me. But it was mindless trash. At worst, it was xenophobic rhetoric. Local, doesn’t mean meaningful, or good.
You saw it on reddit all the time, how people from the US often didn’t even realize they were talking to people across the world. Because it’s a foreign concept to them. Say what you will but it is the one corporate platform that doesn’t care where you are from. Everyone discussing something gets pooled into the same communities and threads, regardless of age, sex, or even timezone.
That is a good thing. We need more of that, not less. Because online and real-world communities DO overlap. But you seem to be asking them to match. That would isolate them, not empower them.
Online communities today are the one way that authentically bridges communities of people across the world. If online communities matched offline communities, why would I ever develop a desire to understand not just my neighbor, but also people across the world?
How would I ever go and find out for myself, how people across the world think and feel? Whether my government speaks true about the threats around us, or if there is more to it?
If you overlap a bunch of circles, they all become connected. If you match them, you get bubbles.
That is how corporate social media has been functioning for over a decade, and it needs to be stopped, not propagated. If we sort people into only one group (like where they are from), you isolate them.
But when you sort each person into least two groups or more, you connect everyone to everyone, by virtue of almost every group having members in common with every other group.


That issue being two years, I’m not sure what the current state of things is.
But servers did move towards EU to combat the problem, and haven’t moved back for what I know.


It wasn’t just a problem. It was literally impossible for them to keep up.
Re-locating the server was the only option, as opposed to skipping events or shutting down until the problem was fixed.


Please do not condescend.
I know it doesn’t have to work that way, but for a time, it did.
Here is one of the github issues on the problem.
And yes. It led to instance relocations.
It was either don’t federate, and wait for an update with unknown eta, or move closer to the big instances.
Saw this a while ago via Mick Gordon.
So glad to see him get work, and also with a game that seems promising.