• 3 Posts
  • 268 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2023

help-circle

  • Sinners spoilers

    I liked the movie, but it had issues.

    The first half of the film sets up a story of two brothers coming back from war. We learn their backstory, we meet others, it’s got “based on a true story” vibes and it’s well told… But it isn’t that interesting. It’s just setup that you hope pays off later.

    Then we first meet the vampire. It’s a weird scene. You’re primed for a realistic story but then the guy is adamant about being invited in, that’s weird. He’s being hunted, that’s weird. And then sure enough, he’s a vampire.

    Now the film is interesting. From that point up until the vampires are all (mostly) defeated, it’s a banger of a film. Action. Intrigue. Music. It’s got it all.

    Then we have an extra bit of action killing KKK members. It doesn’t really need to happen for the story, but it’s fun action and it kinda wraps around to the first part of the film.

    Then we have like 3 endings. The third one is just a bonus, but 1 & 2 leave you feeling differently about the world and story you’ve watched.

    The truth is you could cut away about half the film and it would still be a good film. That’s why it feels boring. You need to get the audience into thinking it’s one kind of film, just so you can surprise them with the other.







  • Absolutely.

    I’ve seen the Broadway show and when they announced they were splitting the film into two I thought it was a huge mistake. It just seemed so unnecessary. After watching the first film I admit I was completely wrong.

    The first film covered the first half perfectly. Excellent story and excellent music. I walked out thinking… Oh shit… What the hell is the second film going to look like?

    When you watch the Broadway show you kinda forgive the weaker second half. You judge the whole thing together and it comes out ahead. But if you have to focus on just the second half. If you have to stretch it out to match the runtime of the first… The cracks are going to be obvious and the weaknesses highlighted.

    It’s the weaker film, but it’s a fun conclusion.



  • MimicJar@lemmy.worldtoGames@lemmy.worldGaming Pet Peeves
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 days ago

    To add, give me some way of tracking these collectables.

    If I’ve collected all of the trinkets in a given area, mark that area in some way. If there are 100 trinkets, number them and give me a list. Give me a map, hints, thing that beeps, something.

    I don’t need any of the above to be unlocked from the start. You can add it in the post game or after I’ve collected some percentage of them or make it a side quest.

    It’s annoying going online and someone has posted “I found 99 of 100 things, where else to look?” and basically no one can help them. It’s annoying being that person, to be so close and yet so far.



  • So technically, in this specific instance, Trump Mobile isn’t run by Donald Trump. It’s instead a separate company run by Don Jr and Eric Trump. That company is then licensing the “Trump” name from The Trump Organization.

    Now The Trump Organization is owned by Donald Trump, although officially run by Don Jr, Eric, etc.

    But you’re absolutely right that all of this is bullshit. It’s also why Trump is so pissed at New York AG Letitia James for investigating and uncovering all sorts of shady business practices.

    You’re absolutely right that Congress should be doing something about it.







  • I understand your first sentence, and I agree that for some of them that might be the case, but I still think more are made for entertainment and winning or being nominated can provide a positive signal.

    To be clear I’m not saying that winning an Oscar is an automatic “best movie ever” signal. It’s a signal to take another look.

    And honestly looking only at last year’s nominees and winners it is a pretty weak signal overall. But if I go back a year, I look over the winners and nominees there…

    I never would have seen “Anatomy of a Fall” if it hadn’t been nominated and/or won for best original screenplay, but after it did and I read about it, I decided to watch it and really enjoyed it.

    Similarly Emma Stone winning best actress for Poor Things got me interested in it. It’s not a film I thought looked interesting, but I like Emma Stone. So I decided to give it a chance. Now I don’t think I liked it as much as other people, but I think the film was worth watching, worth my time.

    Awards let me know that other people have enjoyed something. If I think something looks boring, but then it suddenly wins a bunch of awards, maybe I misjudged it. Maybe I saw the wrong trailer or read the wrong synopsis. Maybe I wasn’t in the right mood at that time.