• 0 Posts
  • 47 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle

  • Thanks, I didn’t see this, there was a different embedded FAQ that didn’t have the specific Q & A below.

    But, if anything, it seems to confirm the ad itself is just legitimately clicked from the user’s IP address and hidden from the user, and that there is code execution protection, but not that there is any privacy protection? It’s still very ambiguous.

    How does AdNauseam “click Ads”?

    AdNauseam ‘clicks’ Ads by issuing an HTTP request to the URL to which they lead. In current versions the is done via an XMLHttpRequest (or AJAX request) issued in a background process. This lightweight request signals a ‘click’ on the server responsible for the Ad, but does so without opening any additional windows or pages on your computer. Further it allows AdNauseam to safely receive and discard the resulting response data, rather than executing it in the browser, thus preventing a range of potential security problems (ransomware, rogue Javascript or Flash code, XSS-attacks, etc.) caused by malfunctioning or malicious Ads. Although it is completely safe, AdNauseam’s clicking behaviour can be de-activated in the settings panel.






  • I remember it was not really a surprising set of metrics: gameplay, graphics, and fun.

    It was about having an experience you couldn’t have at home (or anywhere else) because the games were always noticeably ahead of the curve.

    Graphics were what was most attention-grabbing. It’s hard to communicate how impressive it was since we’re in the diminishing returns era for graphics. But a jump from Pac-Man to Rush 'n Attack or Contra, and from that to Street Fighter II, and from that to Ridge Racer, and that to Daytona USA, and so on… Every step was so imagination-bending.

    What would it feel like now? Maybe like if you could play an actual Pixar movie as a game? Something like that, but there’s nothing that really expresses it, photorealism isn’t even that impressive anymore.




  • To save everyone time, here’s a draft set of productivity bullets for “turtle tester”:

    • Conducted thorough evaluations of turtle shell durability and structural integrity under various simulated environmental conditions.
    • Monitored and recorded turtle behavior to assess mobility and adaptability in controlled habitats.
    • Ensured all testing procedures adhered to ethical standards and guidelines for animal welfare.
    • Collaborated with team members to analyze data and improve testing methodologies for accuracy and efficiency.
    • Prepared detailed weekly reports summarizing findings and providing actionable recommendations for ongoing research.

    It’s important Elon Musk knows these things.








  • I get that it’s usually just a dunk on AI, but it is also still a valid demonstration that AI has pretty severe and unpredictable gaps in functionality, in addition to failing to properly indicate confidence (or lack thereof).

    People who understand that it’s a glorified autocomplete will know how to disregard or prompt around some of these gaps, but this remains a litmus test because it succinctly shows you cannot trust an LLM response even in many “easy” cases.