If you’re using likely and might, it’s just rose coloured glasses.

The freedom is going to make those issues WORSE.

We are already seeing it with how users use the mod log and previous comments as gotchas while ignoring the content. Reddit dealt with those issues and even had automated systems of dealing with these issues.

I’ve seen more posts derailed than stay on topic here, the lack of moderation is its own issue as things stew before they get dealt with as well. Then the mod just nukes everything as it’s easier. If they even do.

It’s the worst of everything and it’s barely holding on. Maybe it’s partly the instance I’m on, but there’s lots of posts with similar gripes I’ve seen as well.

Public mod logs I’ve seen been used for flaming users, I’ve yet to see it be used for what it was designed for.

It’s great in theory, but without proper logging or context, people just glance at the logs, see the bans and/pr removals and flames the user. Which is against the rules! If you’re using it for that, just don’t engage, but people would rather try and use it as a gotcha. While missing context 100% of the time.

If you can’t engage the user and need to usr a public log to launch an ad hominem attack instead of trying to engage the topic, you’re the issue with Lemmy. And this is what the logs are used for unfortunately.

And as stated, the fact that a mod can just encore stuff out of spite (happens) and they don’t even need to provide a reason, or a notice to the user. So they don’t even know they goofed most times.

Legally? They can’t drive.

Anyone with an episode is barred from driving for 6 months, and if you have frequent episodes, well you don’t drive.

Driving is a privilege, not a right, if you can’t drive, you don’t get to. End of discussion.

This is in Canada, and would be shocked if it was much different elsewhere.

Always reminds me of this story

Love the weirdness of codes and laws that allows stuff like this.

That doesn’t mean everyone is in it.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Other than more brands and types of e-bikes? Most have existed for quite a while, just not at a consumer level.

And e-bikes are just circuits, or otherwise proprietary components. You’re gonna be following manufacturer guides, or likely videos, so use site results to specify.

There is plenty of different Booleans for those situations, but there’s not many new inventions in the last 5 years.

Who claimed they were? They are tools to help, they have never included all Booleans and they’ve changed over time, my link from a Google engineer even specifies that. They have never meant to be restrictive like AND, OR and NOT, where do you get this idea from?Your website is cancer FYI.

Use :before, and you’ll get no results past that time.

What?

I use them almost daily.

Booleans. Change the year to 2020, or remove certain sites/results.

All the data is still there, just gotta know how to find it, kinda like an old school library at this point! If you’re going through the process of self learning and/or bettering yourself instead of just watching and repeating, you’ll know how to wade through crap already. And if you want the latter, well googles crapification isn’t a concern to you.

Sure, but people STILL knock on the doors. They likely didn’t participate in a conspiracy to get it, sorry.

Turn off the motion sensor and only use the push activation, that wouldn’t break the “auto” recording portion. There’s always exemptions, security and law professionals wouldn’t be left without a way to assist themselves.

Umm… that could have just been the other driver asking the person for their footage from the camera they saw.

Not everything is a conspiracy dude, that’s commonly done after any incident lmfao.

I have cameras and plenty of people have asked me for random footage for thefts and collisions, none being a company or insurance, always the person affected…

Edit, sorry I guess once the police did, but still there’s nothing odd or weird about what happened to you.

No, I’m asking you. Because you seem to be applying the law to stuff it doesn’t apply to, so I’m trying to figure out your knowledge on it, so we can figure out where you went wrong.

And who said ALL the time, security cameras use motion, or a host of other tech to not record all the time and NOT store it. So which law do you think is being broken?

You are asininely saying that if I took a picture of someone throwing something on my house, that would be inadmissible because the street was in it…? Is that what you think the law is doing here…?

Front yards aren’t…

And you can’t record a public street for security? Even if it’s deleted? That makes absolutely no sense, how would you ever catch a crime?

Front yards don’t have the expectation of privacy… that applies to backyards doesn’t it?