Never expect Linux users to not be completely pedantic instead of looking for an actual joke.
Our News Team @ 11 with host Snot Flickerman
Yes, I can hear you, Clem Fandango!
Never expect Linux users to not be completely pedantic instead of looking for an actual joke.
You’re welcome. Easy mistake to make, I make it constantly, in fact haha!
LLMs Have
LeadLed to 14 Deaths
FTFY
You gotta find a better way to present this other than making it sound like Torvalds is a baby taking a shit. “The one who makes” I’m dead.


The best solution, imho. Been around for a long time and so notorious it got removed for DMCA violations on github and gitlab so it had to move to a service outside US copyright cabal jurisdictions.


I feel like this headline is misleading because I don’t think there is a way to convince privacy experts this is a good idea.
Like, the entire idea is antithetical to privacy experts understanding of the issue. You aren’t going to get them to suddenly turn tail and go “gosh you’re right, I wasn’t thinking of the children!”


I think that’s generally agreed and no one seems entirely sure why catfriend1 chooses to do it this way.


There’s a few different ways for you to probe for info on your USB devices:
lsusb - lists pretty much everything usb related, including root hubs on your motherboard
For a more readable lsusb output you can lsusb -v | grep -E '\<(Bus|iProduct|bDeviceClass|bDeviceProtocol)' 2>/dev/null in my experience it can be helpful to slap a sudo on the beginning as well because sometimes certain devices can’t be polled without root privileges.
usb-devices - similar to lsusb but produces much more detailed (but less human readable) information
find /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb*/ -name dev - produces a list of where the system saves information on usb devices. Each of the listed folders will hold a lot of files with a wealth of information on each usb device, but be very careful and do not edit these files.
You can also do this to see what the system is doing in the background and then try plugging and unplugging devices from the offending usb ports:
watch "dmesg | tail -20"
You’ll at least be able to see if the system is registering anything at all when trying to use those ports, or if it’s as though the system doesn’t see them at all.
I have a similar issue on my Lenovo ThinkBook but the ports don’t work in any OS despite being enabled in the UEFI. I still haven’t figured out what is wrong with them, but it seems they may just be toast. Thankfully the USB-C ports still work and I can just connect a hub to one of those.


Well, as OP mentioned, and others have speculated in the official syncthing forums, apparently catfriend1 did a repository reset where they wiped everything and started over something like three times last year. So that’s still a possibility. I’m going to wait until more information comes out or until catfriend1 doesn’t come back after a month or two before I start worrying about the future of the project. Worth finding anyone who had backed up the most recent version of the repository though, just in case.


yeah catfriend1 was technically in charge of syncthing-fork before the original syncthing stopped being developed. catfriend1 in other words essentially just continued development on their fork on their own, which kept syncthing alive.


I genuinely don’t recall, it was a long ass time ago, but it was an interview with her about her fleeing from Cuba post-Castro-takeover.


I remember stories about the early days of Castro’s Cuba and how an actress who fled to the USA had all her trophies for her acting taken from her and made State Property. I remember it being treated as a cautionary tale of the evils of Socialism (*cough propaganda) using the argument that the Cuban State under Castro did not understand nor care about the difference between private property and personal property (which I find to be a very suspect argument, personally).
I mean fuck me, but this is no different. He’s effectively selling his own memorabilia that he had kept for himself to stay alive. Selling it to the highest bidder, and the highest bidder is almost assuredly some parasite of the capitalist class.


Yeah, pretty sure it was called “Fex” translation layer for emulating x86 binaries on ARM64. To me that was absolutely the biggest takeaway, because that’s a massive game-changer for eventually moving the industry away from x86 exclusivity and into wider adoption of other architectures.


Which is even sadder because Ethereum has always been a trash coin.


For real, that’s actually the opposite of helpful. Documentation should be based on experience from use combined with discussions with the devs (providing they have the time).


Documentation documentation documentation! One of the most often overlooked and wildly important aspects of many major projects is accurate, up-to-date, and detailed documentation. If you’re not a programmer, one of the number one ways you can contribute is to help draft and produce documentation for applications you enjoy! It’s still a contribution to the project!


I always wanted to start an all-man all-theremin band called “ThereMen.”
One of my favorite memories was seeing The Octopus Project and Man or Astro-Man? live and at the end of the show the two bands had “dueling theremins” and the guy from Man or Astro-Man set his theremin on fire.
That’s all I really have to contribute here. Cool project though, I’d still rather save a hell of a lot of money for a Moog.


Absolutely, which was my point. That the tooth thing wasn’t “only two years ago” it’s actually been in the research and development process for probably over 15 years at this point, with a long way to go.


I hear pocket pool is a lot of fun.
I think both of your arguments in this thread have merit. You are correct that it is a misused tool, and you are correct that the better solution is a more compassionate society. The other person is also correct that we can and do at least make attempts to make such tools less available as paths to self harm. Since you used the analogy of people jumping off bridges, I have lived near bridges where this was common so barriers and nets were put up to make it difficult for anyone but the most determined to use it as a path to suicide. We are indeed failing people in a society that puts profit over human life first, but even in a more idealized society mental health issues and attempts at suicide would still happen and to not fail those people we would still need to do things like erect barriers and safeguards to prevent self-harm. In my eyes both of you are correct and it is not an either or issue as much as it is a “por que no los dos?” issue. Why not build a better society and still build in safeguards?