• 0 Posts
  • 39 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 5th, 2023

help-circle

  • COD - Requires Kernel Level Anti-cheat (RICHOCHET).

    Paladins - Requires Kernel Level Anti-cheat (EAC).

    GTA V - Requires Kernel Level Anti-cheat (BattleEYE).

    Destiny 2 - Requires Kernel Level Anti-cheat (BattleEYE).

    This is the fault of the developers themselves not making those games compatible with Steam OS, and has nothing to do with Steam or Linux and everything to do with the developers themselves. So, if you’re going to play the blame game, blame the correct people.

    I don’t know about VR in Linux, but it looks like the other people in this thread have me covered on that and they have explained in detail what’s going on there.

    I’ve been in this space since the original steam machines. You either have no idea what it was like 10+ years ago with Linux gaming, or you’re being willfully ignorant and not finding out anything about what’s going on now and you’re salty for reasons I don’t know and don’t care about. Do not at me. I don’t care what you have to say if all you’re going to do is be sardonic and caustic. You have a nice day.



  • My complaint wasn’t sharing data with law enforcement. It was more about whether or not they should be moderating their platform and banning accounts that intentionally violate the policy. I don’t necessarily have a problem with them sharing information with the police when it’s warranted and there is a credible threat, because nobody should be using something to plan to bomb a restaurant or sports game. But the arguments that I have seen (and made) were pretty much “yeah, you shouldn’t be allowed to plan to kill people on this platform with no moderation, especially when the chats aren’t even encrypted”.

    Even back when the CEO got arrested most of Lemmy was crying foul on that and a lot of comments I saw got downvoted for siding with the 'police state ".



  • Said the person who did no research has no idea what they’re talking about. Steam OS has been pushing game devs and publishers to be more compatible with Linux, not less. Additionally, the only online games that really have problems with steam OS are ones that require kernel level anti-cheat, and we all should be pushing for the downfall of that. It isn’t necessary.






  • I think a lot of people here found it a bit caustic. But I don’t necessarily disagree with the point I think you might have been trying to make.

    There’s a line that’s pretty easy to draw involving intent and behavior. However the actuality is the world isn’t made for us and this is as much an accessibility issue as it is anything else.

    This is pretty clearly demonstrated in the show House. There’s at least one episode where House is in a wheel chair and he illustrates how he can use that wheel chair to get away with a lot of intentional behavior masked as accidental or otherwise unintentional. At one point I believe he even makes it clear it was intention and able bodied people give him a pass because “you wouldn’t hit a guy in a wheel chair”.

    When people think each incident is unintentional they are more likely to be willing to compromise their irritation or boundaries. When they feel the incidents are intentional they feel righteously angry and are less likely to fall back on social norms. However they still generally default (for people with physical disabilities) to compromising their boundaries in order to be socially accepted or not look like the bad guy. This is part of the problem with the whole thing.

    This is part of the problem with this discussion. The main assumption here is that each party is operating on the social norms laid down by NT people and nobody in the thread seems to be readily able to agree on what specific behaviors make you an “asshole” because it’s subjective and ND do not generally have the same reference baseline for what is acceptable.

    This is not making excuses. It’s laying out facts.

    There’s a lot of anecdotes here in this comment thread. There’s a lot of personal experience that is valid but does not necessarily equal the experiences of even a marginally reasonable subset of the population to make an analysis of what constitutes an “asshole”, or what behaviors specifically are NT or ND.

    But it seems we can mostly agree that deliberately using the condition of being neurodivergent as a shield for behavior we know is not acceptable is wrong.

    The scale by which we measure that isn’t decided by ND people though. It’s decided by a society of mostly NT people. And because society by and large doesn’t even necessarily acknowledge those differences and make boundaries based on facts and education rather than feelings we end up with this hodgepodge of badly enforced boundaries, unhealthy masking that does real damage, and under/overreaction.

    But people still deserve empathy. That empathy doesn’t mean you should abandon or alter your boundaries to accept unacceptable behavior.









  • A business is not obligated to tear out every stairway to make a ramp because some of its users require a wheel chair. In the same vein, not every social interaction where a person who is neurodivergent (diagnosed or not) hurts the feelings of another person is necessarily them being an asshole. Another commenter said something about how intent matters. They’re right. It does.

    However it matters for both parties. It’s situational and it’s important to remember that a lot of social interactions involve misunderstandings because there is a lack of communication from both sides and a set of different expectations on both sides.

    I don’t necessarily think it’s fair to view every social interaction through the light of who is the injured party. We don’t do that to people with physical conditions. You wouldn’t accuse a person in a wheel chair of being an asshole for having an expectation of accessibility. But that’s because society as a whole has come to an understanding (by force) that accessibility for these physical conditions is important.

    I don’t think society has come to that realization about ND people, nor do I think that the average person looks at ND behaviors and adapts to them in a meaningful way.

    So when people have an expectation based on Neurotypical behavior and a ND person doesn’t meet that expectation, do they recalibrate at all to temper the expectations?

    One of the commenters here gave an example about working with a ND person and the response the rest of their co-workers had to another person calling them out for it in a fit of anger. The thing is, it should not have gotten to that point. And it’s not just because others should have been setting good boundaries in a healthy way about that behavior. It’s also because they should have been tempering their expectations and not overcompensating for that ND person in an unhealthy way.

    Part of the problems we’re seeing between NT’s and ND’s have a lot to do with communication and an inability to compromise or at the very least try to find resolution in healthy ways.