ObjectivityIncarnate

I’ve got a worthless degree i deeply regret

Meanwhile, not far from this comment is someone claiming no one regrets getting their degree, lol.

were those numbers perhaps cherry-picked to make the situation look more dramatic than it actually is?

If anyone can go from 554th to 5th in any sport/event just by competing among the other sex, nothing else changing, then that obviously indicates something. You can’t handwave that away.

Her personal 100m freestyle time dropping less than a quarter of a second post-transition is honestly a bigger indicator that transition is not making a substantial difference, because that angle completely removes the ‘chance’ element in your opponents being different people.

The very fact that their ranking is lower than what it should be is an issue in and of itself, your disingenuous mockery notwithstanding.

The question is fair, but so very few people are affected, who cares?

The vast majority of people are never murdered, either. But I’m sure it matters to them and their loved ones.

It’s an extreme example for the analogy, but the point stands: it doesn’t follow that a bad thing being rare makes it less bad. This is not a valid argument against.

My understanding is that there is absolutely no evidence that trans women have an advantage.

Going from 554th place pre-transition to 5th place post-transition doesn’t line up with that claim.

The fact that the University of Pennsylvania swimmer [Lia Thomas] soared from a mid-500s ranking (554th in the 200 freestyle; all divisions) in men’s competition to one of the top-ranked swimmers in women’s competition tells the story

In the 100 freestyle, Thomas’ best time prior to her transition was 47.15. At the NCAA Championships, she posted a prelims time in the event of 47.37. That time reflects minimal mitigation of her male-puberty advantage.

During the last season Thomas competed as a member of the Penn men’s team, which was 2018-19, she ranked 554th in the 200 freestyle, 65th in the 500 freestyle and 32nd in the 1650 freestyle. As her career at Penn wrapped, she moved to fifth, first and eighth in those respective events on the women’s deck.

It may not be an issue to you, but it’s an issue to every woman whose ranking is lower as a result. I imagine it especially hurts if you’re pushed out of first place in that way.

It’s now trivial, in 2025, to depict the world as a 3D shape, this is coming a few decades after it matters, imo.

“Daily murder” is a sneaky rhetorical maneuver, considering it’s something influenced more by raw population size, than by capita. It’s easy for there to be a “daily murder” in a country of 340,000,000 people, even when the overwhelmingly vast majority of people do not murder.

Using “few” to trivialize/minimize the racism is no better.

Shame on you for this disingenuity.

deleted by creator

Knowing that Europe literally has a problem with its soccer audiences making monkey noises at black athletes makes this particular bit of condescension all the more ridiculous.

The issue here is that the authorities are letting a piece of half-ass code (Read: AI) decide what is a legitimate threat and, worse still, acting on that determination without question.

Yeah, at the very least, the software should be passing on the statement, and context surrounding it, along with its ‘judgment’, to the authorities, putting all the responsibility for making the call that X genuinely merits action on said authorities.

Of course, that’s just one piece of the puzzle, and not a solution if law enforcement isn’t held accountable when they fuck up.

Is appearance really the first thing it occurs to you to comment on?

EDIT: “Yes, body-shaming is indeed my chief concern, hence my comments based on candid photos” was the response. Cringe.

Anyone else having Jack Thompson flashbacks, except worse because it’s actually gaining some traction?

most of the admins were revealed to have .gov emails

I remember reading that this was something someone just made up and was spread a bunch, but wasn’t true at all.

There are so many better ones out there and they’re not filled

Sucks that it has to

It doesn’t have to.

Technically, borrowing from a library is also ‘being in debt’, but no one considers themselves to be “in debt” to a library they’re currently borrowing from, because there’s no accrued ‘interest’, you just bring the items back at the specified time.

Using a credit card over the month and paying the exact same amount at the end of it, as you would have paid piece by piece over the month had you been using cash, is essentially the same thing.

Only my experience, but I’ve worked both as a teller and as back office in financial institutions for over a decade. Out of all of the people who were chronically overdrawing their accounts, I honestly can’t remember a single one who was doing so off of buying essentials, it was always frivolous luxuries.

Hell, over the years I’ve even heard a coworker talk about how they have no money until their next paycheck at the end of that week, and then later that same day, talk about what designer sneakers they want to buy when they get their tax return.

There are definitely people who struggle to make ends meet, but the fact is, the majority of the times ends aren’t met, it’s deliberate. People in the US are more likely to have a problem with overspending than underearning, on average.

“Overdraft protection” consists of loaning you the money, no matter how much you have right there in your savings acct

That is not universal, many financial institutions let you set it up so that your savings automatically covers overdrafts.

I’ve had that be the case in my Ally accounts since like 2010 at least, for no fee. Hell, Ally doesn’t even charge overdraft fees at all anymore, apparently.

Your ‘reward’ is less than the transaction fee they charge the vendors.

And that has literally nothing to do with customers’ credit scores/reports, and my point was to rebut the assertion that credit scores are intended to be measurements of how ‘profitable’ a borrower is, so it’s meaningless to bring up this irrelevant fact I already knew.