It’s only ever gonna be incredibly niche if it requires some arcane programmer shit to run.
I want to use it but getting into docker is silly.
Mind the shavings
It’s only ever gonna be incredibly niche if it requires some arcane programmer shit to run.
I want to use it but getting into docker is silly.
“No discussing what’s happening”
Whatever the reason for the amateur bullshit, it’s amateur bullshit on the part of the atlantic, which is the actual headline here.
If they thought as effectively as the question in the title, they wouldn’t be doing what they’re doing.
No, they won’t be happy. They’ll be desperately trying to convince themselves they are, though.
Oh shit that is some s-tier emoji use haha
I tried heliboard. It apparently kicks ass on the back end but the front end sucks and that’s the part I use.
FUTO Keyboard is the one!
No possible comeback from this one.
Absolutely. No question.
It’s not a complete solution of course, but it’s part of one.
He’d be a little behind the times leaving reddit only just now, but better late than later.
Eli Manning is a true hero 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
Can you swap out desktop environments in Linux like launchers on android?
I know we hate it and they’ve really done and will still do some deeply fucked up shit, but man…maga is anti-establishment like the left. I’d rather have a class war than a civil war.
A class war could mayyyyyyybe have a constructive resolution. But a civil war? 0% chance. None.
I don’t want either at all but for Christ’s sake at least have it over the right thing if you’re gonna have one.
You’re god damn right we do.
Keep poking the same dead end, Taliban. The way forward could never be behind you. You’ve got it basically figured out. Never question anything.
They can read your thoughts and catch you if you deviate from the plan
Oh, like parents and teachers and pastors. This actually makes that whole shitshow much more normal.
But like in the worst sense.
The last three aren’t examples of propaganda. They can, however, devolve into team sports and make people do dumb shit in the name of being right, but they aren’t more likely to than anything else, it’s an inherent risk with just about anything.
It looks like it only would be disappointing. Copy + pasted comment from the user Optional down below:
Okay so I sludged through all the links and comments and I think I have it now:
Barbara and David Mikkelson started snopes. They got divorced, she sold her half to RIchmond and Schoentrup.
They had met because Richmond started an ad company, their first client was Snopes.
After Barbara sold, David claimed they only got 40% not 50% of the shares which meant everyone spent money and time on lawyers, which everyone loves doing.
Around this time, Richmond sold his ad company. He sold it to Sovrn, who - if they did own Snopes it would totally suck, but they don’t. Richmond held on to Snopes.
In 2022, Richmond and Mikkelson finally agreed to a buyout where Mikkelson would take more of their money and then GTFO. Which he did.
So no, Richmond (and his ‘business partner Schoentrup’ - I suppose just a financial backer? it’s not clear.) runs Snopes by hisself. No ad company involved.
I mean, you could arguel that someone who started an ad company at all, in the first place, should be pelted with rocks and garbage, but even then he sold it before fully acquiring all of Snopes. Presumably, they were also keenly aware that running Snopes and an ad company would not be a good look.
I think that’s it.
Mastodon, get shiny. This foss clunkiness is hamstringing you.
Posting exactly what he’s posting now.