Oh for sure, I guess I should have said for the most part.

It sounds like he was severely trolled. Those aren’t real people, they’re either bots or paid accounts to make people leave. There are ways to counter act it, it’s too bad he’s given up. I wish him the best.

The NYT wants you to think this instead of how eliminating our safety nets is already devastating and going to make this worse. Basically, they want you to blame the local government, not the federal government. So the YSK should be replaced with “We want you to think” or WWYTT

I don’t think that’s a good idea at all. Leaks happen all the time and everyone knows that a lot of those machines are compromised. If republicans know exactly who voted for who, that could be an Alligator Auschwitz trip for certain people.

Does anyone have numbers on that? Microsoft just announced they’re laying off around 10k.

It’s one of the best, but it’s not free from controversy. Look at their board of directors and where they’ve worked (scroll down).

https://sh.itjust.works/comment/12192946

I think they’re mostly creating the world their owners want. I’ve seen articles buried, where you have to have the exact headline to access it.

To go along with what you’re saying, the headline people are usually the biggest problem.

This reads like you have a giant black sign with white lettering and a megaphone at a game. I’m not saying you’re right or wrong, but it’s kind of vague and implying shit.

Louis Anthony “Tony” Cox Jr, a Denver-based risk analyst and former Trump adviser who once reportedly claimed there is no proof that cleaning air saves lives, is developing an AI application to scan academic research for what he sees as the false conflation of correlation with causation.

Cox has described the project as an attempt to weed “propaganda” out of epidemiological research and perform “critical thinking at scale” in emails to industry researchers, which were obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests by the Energy and Policy Institute, a non-profit advocacy group, and exclusively reviewed by the Guardian.

BTW, Sh.itjust.works isn’t US based.

I know. Reuters is owned by a Canadian billionaire family if that’s important to you.

(Scroll down to the comments for info) https://sh.itjust.works/comment/12174374

The Guardian isn’t horrible, but not perfect. Reuters, if you squint, is pretty good 3/4 of the time. Propublica is great for investigative journalism. All of them have horrible headline writers at least half the time. Politico isn’t worth checking, but every month or so, you might miss something. It’s a mixed bag basically, so you have to check out a few.

I try to post the “real” stuff (not what trump says, but what he and the republicans are doing) on politics at sh.itjust.works on weekdays. It’s US based and I’m anti-right.

They’re not that great anyway. They’re barely holding on to my personal list of reliable sources. If I really need something, there are other places to go. Good luck BBC.

I really like the pre-identity thing, especially if you’re going to other types of activity pub applications or switching instances.

This not only has been going on awhile, it’s worse than it sounds.

A French scientist was denied entry at the border earlier this year, in March, after officers unearthed messages criticising Trump on his phone.

Mikkelsen explained: “They threatened me with a minimum fine of $5,000 or five years in prison if I refused to provide the password to my phone.”

And some want wealth to do fun things, help people and not have financial worries.

Only as a last resort and everything else has been tried.

According to two people familiar with the matter, World ID could soon become a way for Reddit users to verify that they are unique individuals while remaining anonymous on the platform.

Reddit knowing who I am isn’t okay though. Who tf trusts them?

Is it inside an annealer? There’s not much techy info in these links, but cool as hell.

Uhhhh, this ain’t cool Nevada, Maine, Rhode Island and Massachusetts:

State-run health care websites around the country, meant to provide a simple way to shop for insurance, have been quietly sending visitors’ sensitive health information to Google and social media companies, The Markup and CalMatters found.

The data, including prescription drug names and dosages, was sent by web trackers on state exchanges set up under the Affordable Care Act to help Americans purchase health coverage.

As visitors answered the questions, their responses were sent to LinkedIn and Snapchat, according to tests conducted by The Markup and CalMatters in April and May.

On the other side of the country, Maine’s exchange, CoverME.gov, sent information on drug prescriptions and dosages to Google through an analytics tool. It also sent the names of doctors and hospitals that people had previously visited.

Isn’t there a way to block bots?