

Not everything that’s poorly written is ai, you should give humans more credit
Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend time with friends.
You can reach me on mastodon @[email protected] or telegram @sukhmel@tg
Not everything that’s poorly written is ai, you should give humans more credit
We have an engineering manager that’s about the same, the only issue is that they let PR through because features are wanted and there’s no time to get things right.
I think, I may be pleased to have to redo everything several times to make it better and simpler, but what we get is that everything is bad but we’ll still merge 😞
I now feel at several times I fucked up quite a lot by making something that works but not something simpler.
My girlfriend is gonna be mighty upset is she thinks I’m into that kinda thing. […] please change the image to something Gnome-related and/or trustworthy.
That’s an interesting takeaway from a DDoS issue
I’d say that trying to get Rust everywhere is just something that is done in the hope it will help the ecosystem mature faster. It’s a bit hard to compete with languages that are 30, 40, or over 50 years old
TBF, your previous post reads to me the opposite way, like ‘it is not enough of a hate site’. Also I would offer you to look at it as a Venn diagram, if something is a hate site and more, it is still a hate site, just with extra
One can be pro- or anti- any concept or thing, some options just make more sense
This is an interesting article, but I think that this standardisation is exactly for port being the same, not for pinning specific implementation of the 600+ pages long standard.
Wow what a marketing scum trick to show all compatible older generations as separate products
because I’m not interested in arguing
This sounds more toxic to me, tbf
This is just gold 🤣
This quote from Linus is what I find inspiring hope of a future wider adoption or Rust: