Microsoft’s AI CEO, Mustafa Suleyman, has shared his opinion after recent pushback from users online that are becoming frustrated with Copilot and AI on Windows. In a post on X, Suleyman says he’s mind blown by the fact that people are unimpressed with the ability to talk fluently with an AI computer.

His post comes after Windows president Pavan Davuluri was recently met with major backlash from users online for posting about Windows evolving into an agentic OS. His post was so negatively received that he was forced to turn off replies, though Davuluri did later respond to reassure customers that the company was aware of the feedback.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Yup, and Linux probably boots faster. On my NVMe w/ full-disk encryption (not through the disk’s microcontroller, through an outside FS), I boot to desktop in like 5 sec or less, and the desktop is fully usable. If I want to launch a program, I type the name and hit enter, and it launches in a couple seconds.

    My M3 Mac is a little worse, since it gets confused about launching an app vs looking for a file, and it takes a bit longer to boot (20-30 seconds?).

    But my SO’s Windows machine is something else. It takes a minute or two to boot, and after that it takes a minute or two to “settle.” I have no idea what it’s doing, but I generally get up and get a drink or something when my SO asks me to get something pulled up. Why is it so crappy?

    • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago
      xxx@xxx:~$ systemd-analyze
      Startup finished in 1.514s (kernel) + 3.331s (userspace) = 4.846s 
      graphical.target reached after 3.328s in userspace.
      

      My machine is instantly usable in <5 seconds.

      • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago
        ❯ systemd-analyze
        Startup finished in 14.565s (firmware) + 5.778s (loader) + 2.920s (kernel) + 3.307s (initrd) + 3.972s (userspace) = 30.544s
        graphical.target reached after 3.926s in userspace.
        

        You’re letting me down firmware!

        • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          What the hell kind of hardware are you running, son? Is your system waiting for the superconducting magnets of your particle accelerator to cool? Is your 400 lbs Honeywell tape drive running self-assessment tests? Is the communications array realigning to restore the connection to your hidden villainous moon base? What is taking fourteen seconds?

          • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            55 minutes ago

            That’d at least make sense, this is a (literal) black box. Seriously, my monitor takes long enough to wake that it’s at the boot loader screen by the time it’s ready.

            I found a post on Reddit claiming it’s a RAM thing, and I should enable XMP to avoid it. But I’ve already got XMP enabled so I need to poke around it again.

            And also disable the 5 second delay in the bootloader, not like I’m ever using that fallback option.

            • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              43 minutes ago

              The usual suspect in this scenario is crappy USB devices, hubs in particular. Unplugging all USB devices and rebooting to check the difference is always a solid and easy first diagnostic step. If that turns out to be the issue you can add them back piecemeal to isolate the offender(s).

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I completely trust Systemd to accurately report on itself, the same as I trust American cops to police themselves.

    • Stefan_S_from_H@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yup, and Linux probably boots faster.

      Someone once wrote something that compiled the Linux kernel on bootup with TinyC. Even this would be faster.