Would that not piss of Jesus? It came to me after watching the pope rap from WKUK.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The character jesus was not a real person

    I think it’s generally accepted that Jesus did exist, as his baptism and crucifixion were documented by third parties at the time.

    • Manjushri@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      All that means is that a person named Jesus may have existed. But that has no bearing on events described in the Bible. It’s like saying you found a birth certificate for a Clark Kent from the 1930’s so that means Superman really existed.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Well if Superman modeled itself as a true story and the Clark Kent you found was the person who inspired the story then yeah you did. It’s not Clarks fault the author lied. Historians don’t only think ‘some dude name jesus exists’. They think that the specific Jesus depicted in the bible was based on a real person. You can be against religion and recognize a historical consensus.

        • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          The Jesus of history is not necessarily the same guy they wrote about. All that is known for sure is that someone named Jesus, who came from Nazareth, existed around the same time. Absolutely nothing else is linked to the name.

          Also, everything that makes up the bible was written several years after that man’s life.