• neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’m not to familiar with zorin, and I don’t see it recommended often. What’s the deal? Any criticisms of it? Especially for new users?

    • Por_que_pine@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Hi, I just switched my home PC to Zorin. I picked it thinking that it would be the simplest version of Linux for my family members to start using, given its similarity to Windows. So far no issues with them using it but it is noticably slower to load programs.

      I use will continue using Mint on my personal devices despite my dislike for using the terminal, having grown up doing everything through the Windows GUI.

    • cyborganism@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Just try it.

      I did and I was pretty impressed. The way they modified the Gnome desktop with extensions is the way Gnome should’ve been in the first place. It’s actually usable.

    • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Which is weird right? Who is recommending this distro for it to surge? Is this actually a lot of downloads when compared to other distros? I’ve never seen it listed once in any of the many “which distro should I switch to?” posts.

        • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 minutes ago

          I’ve never actually read a Forbes article on my own. I’ve seen some Forbes articles posted though. Maybe all these downloads are just from Forbes junkies and they saw the article.

    • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I think it’s just a really good Windows-like. It uses a modified GNOME that looks pretty good. Though as a KDE fangirl, I probably wouldn’t be able to see it as anything other than GNOME. (◕દ◕)

      It’s based on Ubuntu, so I’m sure support is good and breakage is infrequent.

      It also looks like you can pay $50 and get access to the pro version, which can mimic any of the major desktops and also lets you use their exclusive creative suite. If that’s any good, it’s no wonder people are flocking to it. Linux is still kinda mid for creatives.

      Kinda seems like the new Mint, not that Mint is going anywhere.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        All the information I found about the “creative suite” is that it’s Krita, Kdenlive, Darktable, etc.

        • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah, looks like it’s just preinstalled with Pro.

          Kinda bogus that they’d use that as a selling point. Makes it seem like there’s some sort of exclusivity.

        • ffhein@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          IIRC their web site used to make it sound like it was a paid product but it was always possible to get it for free. Can’t remember the exact details, perhaps something similar to those “name your price” softwares that have a pre-filled recommended value but it’s also possible to choose €0? I checked what it looks like nowadays and the Pro version does come up first if you go to downloads, and then there’s a free Core version below it.

    • AliasAKA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It looks and feels a bit like windows with the theming it has out of the box. So it’s probably an easier on ramp and possibly recommended in “what Linux is most like windows” google searches and the like.