• Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They should just rollback to windows xp and patch the security issues. It happily ran on 128MB of ram.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      But how else will you type an installed app name into the start menu and have it open Microsoft edge with shitty search results?

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They sort if did this with Windoes Vista, but instead of fixing issues, they just removed a ton of vulnerable code, which resulted in a bunch of dropped features lol.

      • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Unpopular opinion here, but Windows Vista was perfectly fine after SP1 was released. I migrated from XP-64 Bit to Vista and all around, it worked just as well (after SP1).

        The after SP1 thing is the important bit. Unfortunately, even though a lot of issues were fixed then, it already had it’s reputation as dogshit.

        The other thing is, the NT6 kernel was really strong. MS needs to decouple their UI from the kernel. The Window 11 kernel is actually pretty good. It’s the diabolically awful Windows 11 Interface that is the source of so much Windows evil.

        • Krudler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You know that Vista was an irredeemable piece of shit. Don’t know why you’re bothering to defend it.

          • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Because it wasn’t. After SP1, and moreso after SP2 it was perfectly fine.