• Agent_Karyo@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I love GN for what they do, but I just can’t get into the video format for tech hardware news or reviews.

    For some topics, I totally understand the strength of the video format, but for others it just doesn’t make sense to me. A review is much quicker to process with commentary text and relevant charts for benchmarking. I would argue the same for less in-depth news and analysis.

    I also wish GN had a peetrube channel!

    • hzl@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Is there an actual incentive for any for-profit channel to have a peertube channel? It seems like it would just reduce engagement that they actually get paid for.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 minutes ago

          It would most likely still mean less engagement overall. YouTube recommendations are strongly based on interactions and momentum. If part of your core fanbase watches & interacts on other platforms, you’re recommended to fewer people outside your fanbase, so over time your viewership shrinks.

      • AudaciousArmadillo@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You could still do sponsorships and Patreon, which for quite a few YouTubers are the main revenue sources. But of course if viewers don’t demand it there is no incentive to switch either.