Well you and your neighbors and friends, and the greater community that has the same ideal. If you want to be left alone you have to fight in solidarity for it as long as there are those who act to disturb your peace. It’s a desire, a hope, not a adherence to passivism.
Yeah. Everyone seems to think I’m saying, I will personal murder 1/3 of all humans or that this is some ideal goal.
When instead I’m saying 1/3 of your neighbors will end up dead because they will force others to act.
The only way I see it playing out, it will be a very bloody ordeal until the idea of absolute consent is firmly established in society.
Anarchy doesn’t actually preclude forms of governance. It merely insists anyone can revoke their consent to be governed at any time without providing a reason or asking permission. And that they explicitly consented; no one can be born into it. That’s a detail for those governances system to figure out.
Yeah not sure where you get your numbers from or the basis for that. I can’t imagine someone would be more of an asshole outside of capitalism. Maybe you have some shit neighbors or maybe not and you just need to talk to them.
I don’t know anarchism in depth but reading through the comments here, this is what strikes me as an obvious vulnerability of the ideology. That and the seeming lack of a mechanism against returnung to capitalist production.
The examples of societies in this thread are inefficient in terms of production. While that’s probably a good thing for quality of life, it tells me they likely wouldn’t be able to produce enough defence goods to stop a capitalist from taking over and throwing them into factories for 12 hours per day. Capitalism being great at producing weapons efficiently.
Insurgency is an extremely effective strategy against capitalist imperialism. It’s had a near perfect record for 70yrs now. Not to comment on the majority of ideologies that have utilized it…
lack of a mechanism against returnung to capitalist production
Well, AnCaps are in a mechanism to return to capitalist production (and the consolidation of wealth towards corporatism, monopoly, and fascism).
So the anarchists to the left of that are doing better, even if it’s true that they have no mechanism against returning to capitalist production.
The philosophy, may be sufficient, without mechanism or overly structuralist strategies. And the more everybody’s empowered, the easier and more sure that may be.
Since there is no government, I have no one to explain myself to but their shithead kin, who I will also shoot in the fucking face is they have a problem.
I literally said 37%, those who want to enslave others are in they group. The concept is a cancer that must be eradicate immediately and without prejudice.
I enslave exactly as many people as I want to, zero.
The fact that you think enslavement is inevitable makes my trigger finger really fucking itching.
Then what prevents those with resources to take control of you and own you like slaves? Who will protect you against that?
Well you and your neighbors and friends, and the greater community that has the same ideal. If you want to be left alone you have to fight in solidarity for it as long as there are those who act to disturb your peace. It’s a desire, a hope, not a adherence to passivism.
Yeah. Everyone seems to think I’m saying, I will personal murder 1/3 of all humans or that this is some ideal goal.
When instead I’m saying 1/3 of your neighbors will end up dead because they will force others to act.
The only way I see it playing out, it will be a very bloody ordeal until the idea of absolute consent is firmly established in society.
Anarchy doesn’t actually preclude forms of governance. It merely insists anyone can revoke their consent to be governed at any time without providing a reason or asking permission. And that they explicitly consented; no one can be born into it. That’s a detail for those governances system to figure out.
Yeah not sure where you get your numbers from or the basis for that. I can’t imagine someone would be more of an asshole outside of capitalism. Maybe you have some shit neighbors or maybe not and you just need to talk to them.
I don’t know anarchism in depth but reading through the comments here, this is what strikes me as an obvious vulnerability of the ideology. That and the seeming lack of a mechanism against returnung to capitalist production.
The examples of societies in this thread are inefficient in terms of production. While that’s probably a good thing for quality of life, it tells me they likely wouldn’t be able to produce enough defence goods to stop a capitalist from taking over and throwing them into factories for 12 hours per day. Capitalism being great at producing weapons efficiently.
Insurgency is an extremely effective strategy against capitalist imperialism. It’s had a near perfect record for 70yrs now. Not to comment on the majority of ideologies that have utilized it…
Well, AnCaps are in a mechanism to return to capitalist production (and the consolidation of wealth towards corporatism, monopoly, and fascism).
So the anarchists to the left of that are doing better, even if it’s true that they have no mechanism against returning to capitalist production.
The philosophy, may be sufficient, without mechanism or overly structuralist strategies. And the more everybody’s empowered, the easier and more sure that may be.
Entry to Left Wing Anarchist Reading
I shoot them in their fucking face.
Since there is no government, I have no one to explain myself to but their shithead kin, who I will also shoot in the fucking face is they have a problem.
I literally said 37%, those who want to enslave others are in they group. The concept is a cancer that must be eradicate immediately and without prejudice.
I enslave exactly as many people as I want to, zero.
The fact that you think enslavement is inevitable makes my trigger finger really fucking itching.
Not my anarchism.
Not even anarchism.
Malarchy.
Mal,
Archy.
Anarchy doesn’t mean passivist.
If someone wants to enslave me or anyone else without consent. Dead.
It’s not a discussion. It’s not like there is some gray area here. It’s a violation of everyone else’s freedom to consent.
Either we are all free or no one is free.
Taking someone freedoms is an assault on every other human and must be treated a such.