• warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Did you even read my short comment? They can buy a brick texture from one of many marketplaces. Giving an artist money directly. Instead of giving money to use stolen assets. So that argument doesnt hold up.

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Did you read MY comment at all?

      When you have in-house designers you won’t go shopping around for textures, especially not placeholder ones.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Why are you being obtuse? If the in-house designers didn’t want to make some placeholder textures, they could have used a marketplace instead of AI. Are you just going to keep going in circles?

        • fonix232@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Why are YOU being obtuse here?

          No company with an in-house design team will start trawling marketplaces to spend money on PLACEHOLDERS.

          And it’s not like the designers “didn’t want” to make the textures, you donut - it’s that resources need to be allocated, and making minor textures falls on very tail end of the priority list.

          At which point they probably had one designer generate the needed placeholders using AI, to ensure they’re good enough for placeholders, and called it a day.

          I’ll ask you one better - why are you trying to force companies to go out of their way to spend money? When digital design tools hit the market, would you have been standing in line telling companies to instead hire out actual manual art instead of working with digital tools, if they didn’t have the required in-house resources?