After seeing a megathread praising Mao Zedong, an actual mass killer, and a post about a guy saying “99% of westerners are 100000000000% sure they know what happened in ‘Tiny Man Square’ […] the reasons for this are complex and involve propaganda […],” I am genuinely curious what leads people to this belief system. Even if propaganda is involved when it comes to Tiananmen Square, it doesn’t change the atrocities that were/are committed everywhere else in China.

I am all for letting people believe what they want but I am lost on why one would deliberately praise any authoritarian system this hard.

Can someone please help me understand why this is such a large and prominent community? How have these ideals garnered such a following outside of China?

EDIT: Thank you to everyone who has responded! This thread has been very insightful :)

  • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    sources who usually have a vested interest in the continuation of capitalism

    cool ad hominem & appeal to unreliable authority fallacies. truth doesn’t ultimately rely on authority, but their arguments, so it comes down to evaluating their arguments directly.

    • are they valid?
    • are their premises true?

    if so, then their conclusions are true.

    if you’re only going by authority when an argument is provided & facts can be verified, then you’re vibe-thinking.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Apologies, I assumed it would be obvious that each source should be evaluated for the facts and arguments on their own merits.

      I was talking about the times when documentary evidence is conflicting or doesn’t exist, which is when gauging the reliability of the source and their material interests and motivations becomes the most useful way of parsing fact from fiction.