• rljkeimig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I think the PS2 being so well sold is more impressive because the price adjusted for inflation is closer to $560, or $299 in the year 2000.

    I think part of it was the idea that it could also be a DVD player so you wouldn’t need two devices that helped sell it if I recall correctly.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I remember that was the case for PS3 and BluRay, but not so much DVD and the PS2. PS3 was, what, $300? $400? Where as the cheapest BluRay player that just played BluRay movies was almost a grand.

      I may just not remember it being similar for PS2. I was a sophmore in high school when it came out.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That was absolutely true for ps2 and DVD. They were trying to recapture it with ps3 and blu ray and with less success.

      • rljkeimig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The PS3 was stupid expensive at launch, like $600 in 2006, nearly $1000 in 2026 dollars. But yeah I think that argument was made then also.

        I think the PS2 was marketed specifically for DVD capabilities in some cases, I remember an IR dongle and remote control they sold so you didn’t have to use a controller.