• TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Accelerationism is the intellectual equivalent of pissing your pants to stay warm: comforting optimism at first, but then the frostbite hits you in the dick.

    • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      The meme isn’t arguing for accelerationism. It’s just observing that the US in it’s current incarnation as a fascist state needs to be fought and defeated before anything can get better.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The death of the US Empire isn’t “accelerationism,” it’s an understanding that the number one obstacle to socialism globally is the US Empire, and with it out of the way socialist countries are under far less pressure from the outside. Ideally an indigenous led, decolonial socialist state takes the place of the former US Empire, but a strong and healthy empire isn’t going to get there. That’s why it’s decay is necessary for both Statesians and the international proletariat.

      • JamBandFan1996@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You are off your rocker if you think whatever comes next will be indigenous led lol. Not that I would be opposed to it. The scary thing is though, what does come next? If it’s socialism great, but what if it’s fascism

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s important to recognize that the primary contradiction within the US Empire is settler-colonialism. The ones most oppressed by the current society are generally the ones most quickly adaptive to theory and practice, and this isn’t because oppressed people are “morally superior” but out of sheer survival. It’s also why there are so many queer communists. Without combatting settler-colonialism, anything that takes the place of the US Empire will fundamentally replicate that and would be closer to barbarism.

          The US Empire is already fascist, fascism isn’t a separate mode of production but instead capitalism in decay.

          • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            50 minutes ago

            “native Americans are more likely to like communism” isn’t exactly a solid foundation for establishing “an indigenous led, decolonial socialist state [that] takes the place of the former US Empire,”

            It is highly unlikely that if the us government collapses everyone’s going to be like “whelp let’s let the communist indigenous people lead may as well, even though they don’t have the numbers, arms, food or production to run anything”

            Sure in an idealistic sense it would be cool to go full Ferngully/dances with wolves/Avatar/noble savage cliche but if we’re going to dream that big I’d like an infinite pizza shooting unicorn.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              47 minutes ago

              You’re right, that isn’t a solid foundation. What is, is working class organization along correct lines of struggle, part of which is decolonization, as the US Empire’s primary contradiction is settler-colonialism.

              Further, you’re right to say that if the US Empire collapsed now that it would result in barbarism. That’s the point of organizing, though, so that when the US Empire is in crisis, we can overthrow it and implement a new system.

              None of this is based on ideals, but learning from historical struggles for socialism.

          • JamBandFan1996@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Well, I wouldn’t really say it’s fascist quite yet (maybe I’m ignorant) but it’s well on the way. My point is it could get a lot worse before it gets better

            • Grapho@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              47 minutes ago

              It’s been fascist for decades. Fascism doesn’t become official only when it happens to white people almost as much as the rest of us.

            • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              47 minutes ago

              Both your political parties regularly vote to continue funding ICE, DHS and the NSA. Even as recently as a few days ago. They are both pro-militarisation of the police. They both support the prison industrial complex. They both support US actions in Venezuela. And the fact you can’t make political protests in the US without the risk of being shot or imprisoned nowadays should tell you that you are already living in a fascist state. It’s a fantasy to think that, even if the Dems somehow get this administration out of office, they will fundamentally change any of those things. At least now the mask is off and you know what you are up against. The problem with libs is that they think everything would be a-ok so long as their fascist was in charge.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Fascism and liberalism don’t have hard lines distinguishing them, they each contain elements of the other.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          What do you mean by “human nature” that prevents socialism globally? I’m talking about the real world, where tendencies towards centralization, globalization, and monopolization prepare the groundwork for a collectivized and planned economy, just like what Marx initially observed back in the 1800s in early form.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 hours ago

              There’s no ChatGPT involved, and I’d appreciate you dropping the condescension. People’s way of thinking is determined by their lived experience, how they work and how they get what they need. As it becomes harder and harder for that to happen, at the same time we are already building up incredibly complex systems of production and distribution.

              What remains is for working class organization, revolution, and nationalizing the large firms and key industries, finance, etc in any given country. Other countries have already done this before, it isn’t impossible, and people become increasingly motivated to do so and it becomes increasingly feasible as disparity increases.

              The Party for Socialism and Liberation has a Party Program you can read for a US-based approach.